Purdue Pharma nears new bankruptcy deal with Sacklers, mediator says
Adds judge's ruling in paragraph 4
Mediator Shelley Chapman reports progress in settlement talks
Judge Sean Lane extends freeze on opioid lawsuits against Sacklers until Dec. 2
Supreme Court ruling prevents Sacklers from being shielded by Purdue's bankruptcy
By Dietrich Knauth
NEW YORK, Oct 31 (Reuters) -Purdue Pharma is close to a new bankruptcy settlement with its owners, members of the wealthy Sackler family, and state and local governments that have filed lawsuits alleging that its painkiller OxyContin spurred a deadly opioid-addiction crisis in the U.S., a court-appointed mediator said on Thursday.
Mediator Shelley Chapman said at a court hearing in White Plains, New York that Purdue has made progress in recent days on a comprehensive deal that would resolve the lawsuits, adding that she would soon file a written report on the results of mediation.
"The parties are getting closer and closer by the day and the remaining issues, in our view, are resolvable," Chapman said.
Based in part on Chapman's comments, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane ruled on Thursday that opioid lawsuits against the Sacklers should remain frozen until Dec. 2.
Chapman told the judge that allowing lawsuits to resume would undermine settlement talks and deplete resources that should be reserved for paying opioid creditors.
"You can't make war and peace at the same time," Chapman said. "In order for the mediation to succeed, we need the full, undistracted attention of all the parties."
Purdue was sent back to the drawing board after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling upended its previous bankruptcy plan, which would have granted sweeping legal protections to the Sacklers in exchange for up to $6 billion that would have been spent addressing the harms caused by the opioid epidemic in the U.S.
Chapman did not discuss any terms of the deal. Attorneys representing state and local governments also declined to address the terms under discussion, while saying they were optimistic that a new deal could be reached before Dec. 2, the date when the current litigation stay is scheduled to expire.
The Supreme Court ruled on June 27 that Purdue Pharma's bankruptcy settlement cannot shield the Sacklers, who did not file for bankruptcy themselves, from lawsuits over their role in the opioid epidemic.
Opioid lawsuits against Purdue and the Sacklers have been on hold since 2019, when the Stamford, Connecticut-based drugmaker filed for bankruptcy.
The lawsuits against Purdue and Sackler family members by state and local governments, as well as by individual plaintiffs, have accused them of fueling the crisis through deceptive marketing of its pain medication. The company pleaded guilty to misbranding and fraud charges related to its marketing of OxyContin in 2007 and 2020.
If mediation fails, a court-appointed committee representing Purdue’s creditors has been allowed to sue the Sacklers over claims that the family drained over $11 billion from the company and that their conduct made Purdue liable for other lawsuits.
Reporting by Dietrich Knauth, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, William Maclean and Rod Nickel
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
