Musk expects more from shareholders than himself
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jonathan Guilford
NEW YORK, June 12 (Reuters Breakingviews) -A deal is a deal – sometimes, it seems. Discord is growing among electric-car maker Tesla’s TSLA.O investors over a Thursday vote to ratify Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay package. In some ways, the enormous payout is so absurd, it aligns shareholders with Musk. But months of high-stakes hectoring has revealed gross hypocrisy and changed the facts. Tesla’s leader and its board have degraded credibility needed to side with Musk.
This mess started in January, when a Delaware judge struck down Musk’s 2018 incentive package, finding that it was unfair to ill-informed shareholders. Tesla put the issue back to a vote, hoping to reiterate investors’ consent from six years ago to sway the legal case. The results of that vote will be unveiled tomorrow.
The pay appeared reasonable enough, even given the huge sums involved. Sure, it was crazy, but so was the plan’s milestones – including growing market value 11-fold. Crucially, fixing the impasse could have preceded addressing other issues and refocusing the oft-wandering executive.
And issues need addressing. Leave aside Tesla’s apparently trimmed ambitions on a super-cheap car, or whether Musk appropriately balances Tesla’s interests with his other companies’, a problem gaining urgency. Instead, look at Tesla’s executive departures: Drew Baglino, battery chief; Rebecca Tinucci, who led the company’s charging network; Zachary Kirkhorn, the finance chief once seen as Musk’s potential heir. In a circular argument, Musk is the crucial fulcrum on which Tesla rests by pure attrition.
The trouble is that Tesla boasts an eye-popping valuation, which is reinforced by Musk’s presence. At 62 times expected earnings, according to Visible Alpha, Tesla’s share price multiple wildly outpaces tech darlings Microsoft MSFT.O and Nvidia NVDA.O. The strongest argument to support Musk - as shareholders like Baillie Gifford seem apt to do - is retaining that magic.
Worse, the company has dug in fighting in ways that seem hypocritical. Tesla launched a PR campaign to whip the vote with greater enthusiasm than it’s ever marketed its cars. Musk lambasted dissenting shareholders, like California’s CalPERS, as having “no honor.” And now, with Musk Tesla’s ever-more-key man, board missives imply he has “other places” he could abscond to. Worst of all, it’s still unclear whether a vote will actually sway Delaware.
That shareholders have qualms about what they did six years ago is reasonable. Musk knows the feeling. After agreeing to buy Twitter for $44 billion in 2022, he tried to terminate the deal over claims about inauthentic user numbers. He felt the facts had changed. His attempt failed, perhaps because litigation was a threat. But the only contract Tesla has with shareholders is to be a stalwart fiduciary of their money. Investors now have enough proof to vote in their interests, not Musk’s.
Follow @JMAGuilford on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Shareholders of electric-car maker Tesla are voting on a proposal to ratify CEO Elon Musk’s 2018 incentive package, valued at up to $56 billion at the time. The result will be announced at a meeting on June 13.
A Delaware court in January ordered the package, which was previously approved by investors, to be rescinded because it was unfair to shareholders. In a proxy filing announcing the vote, Tesla said that its advisors “could not predict with certainty” whether the vote would remedy the legal issue.
Shareholders including Californian pension funds CalPERS, which voted in favor of the package in 2018, and CalSTRS have said that they will vote against ratification. They join Norway’s sovereign wealth fund and billionaire Leo Koguan in opposition. Ron Baron of Baron Capital and Cathie Wood of Ark Invest have voiced support, while Baillie Gifford will vote in favor of the package, Bloomberg reported. T Rowe Price also said that the pay plan shows “strong alignment” with investors.
Tesla's market value falls below Musk's milestones Tesla's market value falls below Musk's milestones https://reut.rs/4cjTbC7
Editing by Lauren Silva Laughlin and Pranav Kiran
Activos relacionados
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
