Court validates Mississippi's lifetime ban on felons voting
By Nate Raymond
July 18 (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Thursday upheld Mississippi's lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of certain felonies, saying the policy was not a cruel and unusual punishment.
The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit of Appeals on a 13-6 vote upheld a provision of Republican-backed Mississippi state constitution that dates back to the Jim Crow era that today disenfranchises people convicted of a set of crimes, including murder, rape and theft.
An 2-1 panel dominated by judges appointed by Democratic presidents in August had sided with a group of former convicts who sued in 2018 to regain their right to vote, finding the ban violated the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and usual punishment.
But the conservative-leaning court later voted to have the full 5th Circuit reconsider the matter, resulting in Thursday's ruling, in which all but one of the 13 judges in the majority were appointed by Republican presidents.
U.S. Circuit Judge Edith Jones, writing for the majority, said the U.S. Supreme Court had already in 1974 held states could enact laws disenfranchising felons.
If the plaintiffs wanted to eliminate Mississippi's ban, they needed to instead seek a change in law "through public consensus effectuated in the legislative process, not by judicial fiat," Jones wrote.
Jonathan Youngwood, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, in a statement said they were exploring next steps. "We remain confident in this case, and our clients remain committed to ensuring that their right to vote is restored," he said.
U.S. Circuit Judge James Dennis, in a dissenting opinion joined by five fellow appointees of Democratic presidents, said Mississippi is today among a minority of 11 states that still permanently disenfranchise felons for offenses other than election-related ones.
"Denying released offenders the right to vote takes away their full dignity as citizens, separates them from the rest of their community, and reduces them to 'other' status," Dennis wrote.
He said delegates of the Mississippi Constitutional Convention of 1890 intended the provision, Section 241, "to be nothing else but punitive" and stemmed from a desire to discriminate against Black people in the South after the U.S. Civil War.
The provision's list of disqualifying crimes has been amended twice in the years since, but it has continued to disproportionately affect Black people, according to court records.
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Aurora Ellis
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
