XM মার্কিন যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের বাসিন্দাদের সেবা প্রদান করে না।

Oklahoma attorney general sees 'travesty' if US Supreme Court allows Glossip execution



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Oklahoma attorney general sees 'travesty' if US Supreme Court allows Glossip execution</title></head><body>

Supreme Court to hear convicted murderer Glossip's appeal

Probe raised potential questions about witness's credibility

Drummond's stance opposed by Republican attorneys general

By John Kruzel

WASHINGTON, Oct 6 (Reuters) -When lawyers for Richard Glossip argue before the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to vacate his conviction for a 1997 murder, the Oklahoma death row inmate will have an unlikely ally: Gentner Drummond, the state's Republican attorney general.

Although Drummond has taken conservative stances on issues from immigration to abortion to environmental regulation, the decorated former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot broke with fellow Republican state attorneys general in Glossip's case after concluding prosecutors hid evidence that might have led to an acquittal.

"If he is executed, I believe that it will be a travesty of justice," Drummond said in an interview.

Glossip, now 61, was convicted in 1998 of a murder-for-hire scheme. After an appeals court overturned that conviction based on ineffective defense counsel, Glossip again was found guilty of first-degree murder in a 2004 retrial. Glossip is asking the Supreme Court to grant him a new trial after an Oklahoma court refused to overturn his conviction despite potentially exculpatory evidence being recently uncovered.

The decision by the Supreme Court, which begins its new term on Monday, is expected by the end of June.

Glossip was convicted of commissioning the murder of Barry Van Treese, owner of the Best Budget Inn motel in Oklahoma City where Glossip was a manager. All parties agree Van Treese was beaten to death with a baseball bat by maintenance worker Justin Sneed. Sneed confessed to the murder but avoided capital punishment by accepting a plea deal that involved testifying that Glossip paid him $10,000 to do it.

The victim's family, represented by former federal judge Paul Cassell, filed a brief with the Supreme Court saying, "The truth here is that no evidence was suppressed and Glossip commissioned the murder of Barry Van Treese."

After taking office last year, Drummond began reviewing each of Oklahoma's 28 then-pending death row cases. The veteran trial attorney saw hallmarks of a rock solid prosecution in nearly all these convictions: direct witnesses, corroborating witnesses and what he called "facts galore" indicating a defendant's guilt.

But what he saw in Glossip's case troubled him.

Securing a murder conviction against Glossip hinged on the testimony of Sneed, who was a methamphetamine addict, and the reliability of his account. Glossip admitted to helping Sneed cover up the murder after it occurred, but denied knowing that Sneed planned to kill Van Treese or encouraging him to do so.

"The state's witness was the murderer, and he was endorsed for the death penalty until he turned state's evidence and said, 'Oh, not me, but Mr. Glossip - he's the mastermind,'" Drummond said. "That struck me as very odd."

INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION

Drummond commissioned an independent investigation and disclosed information - including a prosecutor's hand-written notes from a meeting with Sneed - that had been withheld from Glossip's lawyers.

The new information cast doubt on Sneed's credibility, Glossip's lawyers said. They contend they were kept in the dark about Sneed receiving psychiatric treatment for bipolar disorder immediately after his arrest, and that prosecutors failed to correct a false statement Sneed made about his prescription for the medication lithium.

These revelations led Drummond to reach a momentous conclusion: If prosecutors had given defense lawyers all the exculpatory evidence they possessed, as required by law, then Glossip might have been acquitted.

"I don't believe Mr. Glossip was given a fair trial," Drummond said.

Glossip's case is not the first time Drummond has pushed back against an order to kill.

In 1991, while flying an F-15 Eagle in a nighttime operation during the U.S.-led Persian Gulf War against Iraq, Drummond disobeyed three direct orders to fire a missile at an aircraft that had been identified as hostile. Facing anti-aircraft artillery fire and low fuel, then-Captain Drummond insisted on personally confirming that the aircraft was an enemy before shooting it down.

Drummond was later awarded the U.S. Distinguished Flying Cross for identifying the jet as an allied Saudi aircraft and withholding fire. His 1991 military citation said his actions had "prevented the tragic loss" of allied forces' lives.

In Glossip's case, Drummond showed "an unusual amount of courage" by asking the Supreme Court to halt Glossip's execution and grant him a new trial, said Robin Maher, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center nonprofit group.

"It's impossible to overstate just how extraordinary it is," Maher said.

Drummond's support, Maher added, may be the reason why the Supreme Court chose to halt Glossip's execution and hear his case rather than reject it, as typically happens when death row inmates appeal.

Because Oklahoma's attorney general is supporting Glossip's appeal, the Supreme Court had to take the rare step of tapping an outside lawyer - private attorney Christopher Michel - to argue that Glossip's conviction should be upheld.

Michel in his Supreme Court brief, among other things, sought to rebut the claim by Glossip's lawyers that the newly disclosed information undermined Sneed's credibility or the prosecution's handling of the case.

Drummond's maverick streak has put him at odds with Republican attorneys general from eight states who urged the justices to clear the way for Glossip's execution. He previously bucked fellow Republicans in Oklahoma by successfully suing on constitutional grounds to block the first taxpayer-funded religious charter school in the United States.

Drummond said he did not weigh any possible political risks for backing Glossip, such as being painted by opponents as soft on crime.

"If that means I'm never elected again, then I can go to my grave being satisfied that I did the right thing," Drummond said.

Drummond believes Glossip's role in covering up Van Treese's murder makes him at least an "accessory after the fact," justifying a long prison sentence. But Glossip's murder conviction was too flawed for Drummond to defend.

"Oklahomans deserve to have absolute faith that the death penalty is administered fairly and with certainty," Drummond said.

Drummond said he feels duty-bound to attend executions to honor victims and their families, and the memory of those put to death. Seven times as attorney general he has sat four feet (1.2 meters) away as an inmate strapped to a gurney was administered a lethal injection.

Drummond said he will enforce whatever judgment the Supreme Court makes concerning Glossip, even if it means supervising an execution he believes to be wrong.

"I feel strongly that my position is correct," Drummond said. "But if a majority on the Supreme Court says otherwise, I will be in the death chamber with Mr. Glossip."


US Supreme Court to hear Oklahoma death row inmate Glossip's appeal ID:nL1N3EC16N

Grieving Bronx mother urges US Supreme Court to uphold 'ghost gun' curbs ID:nL1N3LE13I

Gun, transgender rights, porn cases loom as US Supreme Court returns ID:nL1N3LD18K


Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham

</body></html>

সর্বশেষ খবর

Two ceremonies show Israel's conflicting narratives over Oct. 7


Soccer-Marin penalty grabs draw for Cagliari at Juventus

J

Wall St Week Ahead-Investors look to earnings to support record-high stock prices

J
U

Most Gulf markets fall as geopolitical tensions in region climb


Floods in Bangladesh leave five dead, thousands stranded

দাবিত্যাগ: XM Group এর সত্ত্বাগুলো শুধুমাত্র কার্যকর সেবা প্রদান করে এবং আমাদের অনলাইন ট্রেডিং সুবিধা গুলো উপভোগ করতে দেয়, সেইসাথে একজন ব্যক্তিকে ওয়েবসাইটে বা এর মাধ্যমে উপলব্ধ বিষয়বস্তু দেখতে এবং/অথবা ব্যবহার করার অনুমতি দেয় তবে এটি কোন পরিবর্তন বা প্রসারিত করার উদ্দেশ্যে নয় বা এমন কোন কারণেও নয়। এই ধরনের প্রবেশ এবং ব্যবহার সবসময় কিছু বিষয়ের সাথে জড়িত: (i) শর্তাবলী; (ii) ঝুঁকি সতর্কতা; এবং (iii) সম্পূর্ণ দাবিত্যাগ। এই ধরনের বিষয়বস্তু তাই সাধারণ তথ্য হিসেবে ছাড়া আর অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে প্রদান করা হয় না। অনুগ্রহ করে বিশেষভাবে সচেতন থাকুন যে, আমাদের অনলাইন ট্রেডিং সুবিধার বিষয়বস্তুগু্লো আর্থিক বাজারে কোনো লেনদেন করার জন্য অনুরোধ বা প্রস্তাব নয়। কারণ যেকোনো আর্থিক বাজারে ট্রেডিং করলে আপনার মূলধনের সাথে একটি উল্লেখযোগ্য ঝুঁকি জড়িত থাকবে।

আমাদের অনলাইন ট্রেডিং সুবিধায় প্রকাশিত সকল বিষয়বস্তু শুধুমাত্র শিক্ষাগত/তথ্যমূলক উদ্দেশ্যে তৈরি করা হয়েছ এবং এতে আর্থিক, বিনিয়োগ কর বা ট্রেডিং পরামর্শ এবং সুপারিশ ধারণ করা উচিত নয় - আমাদের ট্রেডিং মূল্যের একটি রেকর্ড; অথবা কোনো আর্থিক উপকরণে লেনদেনের প্রস্তাব, বা অনুরোধ; অথবা আপনার কাছে অযাচিত আর্থিক প্রচার হিসেবে এটিকে ধারণ করা উচিত নয়।

কোন তৃতীয় পক্ষের বিষয়বস্তু, পাশাপাশি XM দ্বারা প্রস্তুত বিষয় বস্তু যেমন মতামত, সংবাদ, গবেষণা, বিশ্লেষণ, দাম, অন্যান্য তথ্য বা এই ওয়েবসাইটে থাকা তৃতীয় পক্ষের সাইটের লিংক গুলো "যেমন-রয়েছে" ভিত্তিতে সরবরাহ করা হয় সাধারণ মার্কেটের ভাষ্য হিসেবে এবং বিনিয়োগের পরামর্শ গঠন করবেন না। যেকোনো বিষয়বস্তুকে বিনিয়োগ গবেষণা হিসেবে বোঝানো হলে, আপনাকে অবশ্যই মনে রাখতে হবে এবং স্বীকার করতে হবে যে বিষয়বস্তুটি বিনিয়োগ গবেষণার স্বাধীনতার প্রচারের জন্য ডিজাইন করা আইনি প্রয়োজনীয়তা অনুসারে তৈরি করা হয়নি এবং এটি বিবেচনা করা হবে না প্রাসঙ্গিক আইন ও প্রবিধানের অধীনে বিপণন যোগাযোগ হিসেবে। অনুগ্রহ করে নিশ্চিত করুন যে আপনি অ-স্বাধীন বিনিয়োগ সংক্রান্ত আমাদের বিজ্ঞপ্তি পড়েছেন এবং বুঝেছেন। পূর্বোক্ত তথ্য সম্পর্কিত গবেষণা এবং ঝুঁকি সতর্কতা, যা এখান থেকে প্রবেশ করা যেতে পারে।

ঝুকি সর্তকতা: আপনার মূলধনে ঝুকি রয়েছে। লিভারেজকৃত পণ্য সবার জন্য উপযুক্ত নাও হতে পারে। অনুগ্রহ করে আমাদের ঝুঁকি প্রকাশ পড়ুন।