US judge issues order to reopen Citgo data room, restart bidding
Judge Stark orders reopening of Citgo data room for new bids
Updated financial, operational details to be available to all
Court expects new bids can be submitted starting early 2025
By Marianna Parraga
HOUSTON, Dec 16 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge overseeing an auction of shares in the parent of Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum on Monday agreed to reopen a data room to allow potential buyers to prepare new bids, a court document showed.
Judge Leonard Stark ordered the data room to be opened on Wednesday after listening to creditors in the case urge a new bidding round. The court is auctioning shares in Citgo parent PDV Holding to repay $21 billion in claims against Venezuela and state oil firm PDVSA for expropriations and debt defaults.
A conditional offer ofup to $7.3 billion by an affiliate of hedge fund Elliott Investment Management had failed to gain support fromcreditors, leading to the bidding restart.
"The virtual data room shall be reopened on December 18," Stark said in his order. A court officer supervising the auction and creditors must present their arguments on issues still in dispute in the coming days, he added.
For months this year, Elliott affiliate Amber Energy had exclusive access to the data room while negotiating its bid. That exclusivity was widely criticized by creditors and Venezuela's lawyers as it sidelined others, they told the court.
Stark in recent weeks made public his inclinations on a new schedule and structural changes aimed at granting a fair bidding process for all parties, including equal access to the data room and a termination fee.
If those proposals are confirmed, the auction could set a stalking horse bid, which was not used in the first two bidding rounds this year.
Amber's highly conditional offer and parallel lawsuits by the same Venezuela-related creditors in other U.S. courts this year soured the court's effort to craft a deal that would satisfy creditors.
The new bidding will relaunch a process that had led to negotiations, but no approved agreement.
An attorney for Amber on Friday confirmed that a proposed purchase agreement with the court officer overseeing the auction was "moot."
Amber's original offer proposed to withhold proceeds from creditors while it settled bondholder claims, potentially leaving little or nothing for creditors who originally brought the case.
Reporting by Marianna Parraga; Editing by Richard Chang
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
