China's state importer books US soy purchases as tariff threat looms
Sinograin buys 500,000 tons of U.S. soybeans for March-April, traders say
Sinograin prefers U.S. beans for storage due to quality
Deals come ahead of inauguration of Trump, who has promised hefty China tariffs
Purchases may aim to replenish reserves, not political appeasement, analysts say
By Karl Plume
CHICAGO, Dec 19 (Reuters) -China's Sinograin has bought nearly 500,000 metric tons of U.S. soybeans this week for shipment in March and April, paying more for U.S. supplies for state reserves rather than buying cheaper Brazilian beans, two U.S. traders familiar with the deals said.
China is the world's top soy buyer and a crucial market for both U.S. and Brazilian farmers, who supply the bulk of China's imports.
The industry is monitoring sales and trade flows to China closely ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20, on concern that another round of tit-for-tat tariffs would erode the value of U.S. soybeans Sv1.
Soy prices hit four-year lows this week on trade tensions and amid high U.S. stockpiles and a looming record harvest in Brazil.
Sinograin's purchases this week follow deals China booked last week for around 750,000 tons for shipment from January to March. Those are modest volumes for Sinograin, China's state-run grains trader and strategic reserves manager, which typically buys millions of tons at a time, the traders said.
Sinograin prefers U.S. beans when it is buying for storage because they are less prone to spoilage than those from Brazil, traders said.
Sinograin did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.
That would explain Sinograin paying more for U.S. beans, rather than buying cheaper Brazilian beans that will be abundant during the March-April delivery period, according to market analysts.
Sinograin bought at around 90 cents a bushel over Chicago Board of Trade March futures SH25 and 80 cents over May futures SK25 on a free-on-board (FOB) basis, according to one trader, around 80 cents to $1 above Brazilian FOB prices for that period.
The purchases come as overall Chinese agricultural imports have slowed. They also come as Brazil, China's top soy supplier, is preparing to harvest a record crop.
Poor processing margins for turning soy into animal feed and oil are discouraging imports, and tariff threats by Trumphave stoked tensions between the two economic powers.
U.S. exporters have been racing to ship soybeans to China before Brazilian supplies hit the market early next year and before Trump takes office.
Imports by private crushers could be subject to any tariffs imposed on U.S. supplies by China in response to Trump's mooted duties. That would make the soybeans costly. State-run importers, however, are more likely to receive tariff exemptions, traders said.
Chinese purchases of the most recent U.S. soybean crop for shipment through next summer are running about 6% behind last year, compared with forecasts for a mere 2.6% drop in Chinese imports of soybeans, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.
The purchases may be intended as an olive branch to trade hawks in the incoming U.S. administration, the traders said. But market analysts said they were more likely intended to replenish the country's strategic reserves, because the volumes were not big enough to score political points.
"If the Chinese do it for political appeasement it's millions of metric tons, not a few tons here and there," said Dan Basse, president of Chicago-based AgResource Co.
The recent purchases were much smaller than other deals viewed as political appeasement, such as the roughly 3 million metric tons purchased in a single week ahead of an APEC summit in November 2023 where relations between China, Taiwan and the U.S.were at the top of the agenda, he said.
The price premium for U.S. beans also suggests China is looking to top off its reserves - and that the buying spree could be short-lived, Basse said.
Volumes in China's state reserves are a closely guarded secret, although supplies are regularly auctioned off to domestic crushers then refilled with fresh supplies.
"When South America is a dollar a bushel cheaper than the United States, it's hard to keep doing this," Basse said.
Unlike private Chinese crushers which are more price sensitive, Sinograin tends to be more focused on soybean quality, said a veteran soy industry executive in China.
"Brazil beans are so easily degraded in storage, never being considered for the reserve program," the executive said. "Only quantity will tell if the purchases are out of concerns over a possible trade war."
Reporting by Karl Plume in Chicago and Mei Mei Chu in Beijing; Editing by Simon Webb, P.J. Huffstutter and Lincoln Feast.
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
