Chevron's $53 billion deal for Hess faces new delay over arbitration schedule
Exxon claims right of first refusal to Hess asset sale
Arbitrators' ruling may fall into second-half of 2025
Chevron, Hess 'confident' merger will still go ahead
Adds Chevron and Exxon comments, background, paragraphs 4-11
By Gary McWilliams
HOUSTON, July 31 (Reuters) -Chevron Corp's CVX.N proposed purchase of oil producer Hess HES.N faces a lengthy new delay, with an arbitration panel not expected to hear a rival's claim to Hess' stake in a Guyana oil-producing joint venture until May 2025, the company said on Wednesday.
Exxon Mobil XOM.N and partner CNOOC Ltd 0883.HK filed arbitration claims claiming a pre-emption right to any sale of Hess’ lucrative stake in the Guyana oil-producing joint venture, a move that threatened to block Chevron’s biggest deal in more than two decades.
Hess last October agreed to sell itself to rival Chevron in a $53 billion deal that would give Chevron a 30% stake in the consortium that controls all of Guyana’s oil production. Exxon leads the consortium with a 45% stake.
"Chevron and Hess had expected and requested that this hearing be held earlier, but the arbitrators’ common schedules did not make this possible," a Chevron spokesman said in a statement.
"Exxon and CNOOC continue to ignore the plain language of the operating agreement, and Chevron and Hess remain confident that the arbitration will confirm that the Stabroek ROFR does not apply to the Merger."
Chevron and Hess remain committed to the merger and look forward to combining the two companies, the spokesman added.
"We appreciate the arbitration panel giving this issue the due consideration it deserves," an Exxon spokesperson said. "This matter is too important to rush through - all relevant facts and circumstances must be taken into consideration, and this will take time."
Hess did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
HESS, CHEVRON SHARES FALL
The lengthy delay puts new strains on Chevron and Hess investors. In April, Hess had said it wanted the case to be heard by the third quarter and the arbitration completed by year-end.
Hess shares were down 2.5% in after-hours trading after closing at $153.42 during the regular session. Chevron shares were down less than 1% in after-hours trading after closing at $160.47.
Exxon has argued a right of first refusal clause in its Guyana joint operating agreement with partners Hess and CNOOC was triggered by the Chevron bid. Chevron and Hess dispute that claim.
Reporting by Gary McWilliams in Houston
Editing by Matthew Lewis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
