Yara-backed plan for tariff on Brazil ammonium nitrate stirs controversy
By Ana Mano
SAO PAULO, June 20 (Reuters) -A proposal to introduce a tariff on ammonium nitrate imports has pitted chemical industry lobby Abiquim against local fertilizer blenders and powerful food producers that favor foreign supplies.
The request by Abiquim, still pending before the development and trade ministry, highlights broader implications of Western sanctions on Russia, which the lobby says ended up bolstering exporters in Asia with cheap access to natural gas used as feedstock and fuel to make crop nutrients.
Critics of the levy on ammonium nitrate, utilized also in explosives, say the tariff would penalize about 90% of domestic consumption as Brazil relies basically on imports for supply.
The country imported 1.1 million metric tons last year, 84% from Russia, according to trade data. This year through May, imports were 629,497 metric tons against national output of 64,143 tons, according to Sao Paulo-based fertilizer group Siacesp.
Norway's Yara YAR.OL, the only Brazilian producer, defendedAbiquim's proposal but conceded "it's not the long-term answer."
"Obviously, the structuring solution for the country is to have competitive natural gas [prices], though the tariff is an important tool to guarantee market equality and safeguard the national industry," it said in a statement to Reuters.
Yara's domestic production capacity is 416,000 tons. The company said it made some 90,000 tons of ammonium nitrate for agricultural use last year.
Abiquim's President Andre Cordeiro said in an interview the temporary tariff would level the playing field against imports at a time the domestic chemical industry's utilization capacity hit a 30-year low, averaging 64%.
He noted natural gas prices can cost up to seven times more in Brazil, adding a deluge of cheap imports can lead firms to close doors, including Yara's unit in Sao Paulo state.
Abiquim requested the levy on ammonium nitrate to go from zero to 15%.
AMA, which represents Brazilian fertilizer blenders, denounced the proposal as protectionist, accusing one multinational company of controlling domestic supplies in a document sent to the development and trade ministry. AMA specifically mentioned Yara can produce more than 2 million tons per year at its European plants while output in Brazil is much smaller and not entirely destined to make fertilizer.
Other groups strongly opposing the tariff include Brazilian soy, corn, cotton, coffee, beef and sugarcane lobbies. They argued in a public consultation it could raise local food production costs.
"With the price of natural gas in Brazil and other external factors, producing nitrogen fertilizers in the country has become an economically inviable activity," Yara said.
Reporting by Ana Mano; Editing by Josie Kao
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
