Winner’s curse unfairly haunts $7 bln paper deal
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Liam Proud
LONDON, April 19 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Chunky acquisitions tend to destroy shareholder value, numerous studies have found. It’s therefore understandable that investors often take fright when a company they own launches a takeover bid. Sometimes that scepticism obscures a good thing, however – as International Paper’s IP.N purchase of UK-listed packaging peer DS Smith SMDS.L might show.
The transatlantic pairing, agreed on Tuesday, was sealed on Friday when rival bidder Mondi MNDI.L dropped out of the race. The Memphis, Tennessee-based victor is handing DS Smith investors 0.1285 of its own shares in return for each one they hold of the target’s, implying an equity offer of almost $7.4 billion based on undisturbed share prices.
The worry for International Paper chair and outgoing CEO Mark Sutton is that investors seem wary. His share price is down by more than a tenth since March 25, the last trading day before the public approach. That’s reduced the real premium on offer for DS Smith to 30%, rather than the original 48%. The rest of the paper and packaging sector has dropped, but not by as much as the acquiror.
The slide is arguably surprising since the combination will create annual cost savings of around $500 million, according to International Paper. Those synergies have a net present value of $3.4 billion, based on Breakingviews calculations using a 25% tax rate, 10% discount rate and the buyer’s estimated integration costs of $370 million.
True, Sutton is effectively paying away two-thirds of that value to DS Smith since the undisturbed bid premium over the target’s share price was equivalent to about $2.4 billion. But there should still be about $1 billion worth of goodies left for International Paper itself. Sutton’s shareholders seem not to believe it.
Investors may see the cost-cut estimate as overcooked, or they may mistrust cross-continental empire building. Even if only two-thirds of the synergies came through, however, International Paper’s return on the investment would be about $950 million in four years’ time, using Visible Alpha consensus operating profit estimates for DS Smith of $935 million and a 25% tax rate. That’s a near-10% return on investment. Assume all the synergies materialise, and the return is a handy 11%.
It’s worth considering the alternative. Peers like Smurfit Kappa SKG.I and WestRock WRK.N are pairing up, in a sector that generally rewards scale. Forgoing a deal, for International Paper, would come with risks of its own. At least Sutton hasn’t left himself strategically boxed in.
Follow @Breakingviews on X
CONTEXT NEWS
UK packaging and paper group Mondi said on April 19 that it had dropped its pursuit of local peer DS Smith.
The board of DS Smith on April 16 blessed a rival offer made by International Paper.
Shares in DS Smith fell by 10.1% to 359.1 pence as of 1420 GMT on April 19.
Graphic: International Paper vs. sector index since DS Smith bid https://reut.rs/3JqYkf2
Editing by George Hay and Oliver Taslic
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
