Why Ford's three-row electric 'personal bullet train' SUV went off the rails
Ford pivots to hybrid three-row SUVs, resulting in costs of up to $1.9 billion
Ford delays next-generation electric F-150 truck to 2027, adds electric van
Ford exec says EV pivot is necessary for future profitability
Analysts question Ford's slow pivot and lack of flexible product plan
By Nora Eckert
DETROIT, Aug 22 (Reuters) -At a packed investor day in Dearborn, Michigan, last year, Ford Motor F.N executives lauded their forthcoming three-row electric SUV, which they said would be rolling off assembly lines in 2025.
"We call it a personal bullet train. It's beautiful and it's unlike anything in the segment so far," Doug Field, Ford's head of EVs, and a former executive at Apple AAPL.O and Tesla TSLA.O, said at the May 2023 event.
Fifteen months later, the personal bullet train was officially derailed on Wednesday as the U.S. automaker killed it before it even launched, a sign of the industry's deepening retrenchment on EVs as consumers have been slower than anticipated to jump on board battery-powered technology.
"The reality is that the market changed," Marin Gjaja, Ford's chief operating officer for its EV division, told Reuters on Thursday. "As we saw the growth and adoption rate fade, we were furiously trying to catch up."
Ford executives said they would instead focus on hybrid three-row SUVs, one of the most prominent EV product pivots to date - and one that could cost the company up to $1.9 billion.
Removing a significant vehicle from Ford's EV future, one that executives had promised would differentiate the company in a crowded field, also means leaders will have to refresh their pitch to investors about how they will turn around the automaker's slumping stock.
"You've been in that box with all of us and it's now time to break out," Ford CEO Jim Farley told investors during the May 2023 event, referring to the company's stock valuation, after touting the three-row SUV. Ford shares have fallen 25% from their July peak this year, and are down about 5% from the 2023 investor day.
But Gjaja said Ford's pivot is a sign the company is making the hard decisions necessary to produce profitable EVs, something he said is a challenge even for EV giants like Tesla TSLA.O.
"The real question here is, how do we create enough scale with the right products, with the right features and offerings that can get us to a scale level where we can be profitable on both the vehicle side and on the software services," Gjaja said.
On Wednesday, Ford also said it planned to push back another much-anticipated vehicle, the new electric version of its F-150 truck, until 2027, two years after it was initially intended to launch. It said it will add an electric van to its future lineup as it doubles down on its strengths: pickup trucks and commercial vehicles.
Ford will provide an update on its EV plans in the first half of 2025.
Some industry observers wondered why it took the automaker so long to switch gears.
"The criticism Ford will have to face is why its product plan was not more flexible from the beginning, why it has been slow to implement these changes, and why investors will need to wait for a comprehensive update until next year," Bernstein analyst Daniel Roeska said in a research note.
'STARTING TO SEE THE FRUITS'
With the EV truck delayed, the three-row SUV killed and Ford facing EV losses of up to $5.5 billion this year, investors are eagerly awaiting Ford's affordable EVs from its "skunkworks" team, made up of more than 100 engineers and software specialists based in California.
Farley has said he is staking the company's future on this group's success. The first such product will be a midsized electric pickup, Ford said Wednesday.
"The progress they've made in two years is nothing short of breathtaking, and we're starting to see the fruits of that," Gjaja said. Still, buyers will have to wait more than two years before that model rolls off assembly lines.
Ford's decision to shift into building three-row hybrid SUVs, instead of EVs, is providing some reassurance to analysts about its near-term strategy. The automaker and many rivals are increasingly leaning in to hybrid technology that combines an electric motor with a gasoline-powered engine as a bridge to EVs, and Farley has said hybrids will likely be a significant part of Ford’s portfolio in the future.
The $1.9 billion hit on the cancellation of the three-row SUV will sting, but many analysts said Ford ultimately made the right call.
"There's no sense making what's potentially already going to be a $1.9 billion hit an even bigger number by sticking with the vehicle even though you know you don't have a path to profitability with it," Morningstar analyst David Whiston said.
Still, Ford's crosstown rival General Motors GM.N is standing by plans to begin production of an electric three-row SUV this year - the Cadillac Escalade IQ, which Whiston said is a result of GM's earlier start into building ground-up EVs.
Ford's shares tumble from 2023 high https://reut.rs/3YRkUXj
Reporting by Nora Eckert in Detroit, additional reporting by Ben Klayman in Detroit; Editing by Matthew Lewis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
