Walmart's firing of pregnant worker suggests widespread bias, complaint says
Adds Walmart statement in paragraphs 5-6
By Daniel Wiessner
Oct 1 (Reuters) -Walmart was accused on Tuesday of firing an employee at an Ohio store because she was pregnant, which a nonprofit group said is likely part of a broader pattern of discrimination by the largest private U.S. employer.
The National Women's Law Center filed complaints with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and its state-level counterpart in Ohio on behalf of Corrissa Hernandez, who said she was fired earlier this year after requesting a part-time schedule and permission to sit while working as a cashier.
The NWLC said at least one other pregnant employee at the Oberlin, Ohio, store where Hernandez worked faced similar treatment, and urged the EEOC to investigate Walmart's practices across the country.
"We, and our client, are concerned that in addition to other pregnant employees at the Oberlin store, workers at the many other Walmart stores nationwide may also be experiencing or be vulnerable to discrimination," the NWLC said.
Bentonville, Arkansas-based Walmart in a statement provided by a spokesperson said it was reviewing the complaint.
"We don’t tolerate discrimination of any kind and provide reasonable accommodations to thousands of associates," the company said.
Hernandez in the complaint said she learned she was pregnant after being hired by Walmart in March. A month earlier, she had miscarried while working in a job that required her to lift and turn patients in hospital beds, according to the complaint.
Hernandez said she requested accommodations from the store's lead cashier in April, and shortly after was told by a manager that she was being fired because upper management was concerned that she would call out or leave work early.
Walmart previously excluded pregnancy from a list of medical conditions for which it provided accommodations, but has said in court filings in other cases that it changed that policy in 2017 in response to complaints and an EEOC probe.
The commission in a 2018 lawsuit accused Walmart of discriminating against pregnant workers at a Wisconsin warehouse by denying their requests for restrictions on lifting and other physical tasks. The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022 upheld a judge's dismissal of that case, saying Walmart's accommodation policy was valid because it applied equally to all workers.
Walmart in 2020 had paid $14 million to settle a proposed class action claiming it had routinely denied "light duty" assignments to pregnant workers while granting them to injured and disabled workers. The company denied wrongdoing.
A 2023 federal law, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, requires most employers to provide accommodations for pregnancy. Previously, employers only had to grant accommodations to pregnant workers that were already given to employees with other medical conditions.
Hernandez's complaint accuses Walmart of violating the PWFA, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and comparable Ohio laws.
Read more:
Walmart defeats U.S. agency's pregnancy discrimination lawsuit
Wal-Mart faces another pregnancy bias claim at EEOC
Walmart's $14 mln settlement of pregnancy bias claims approved by judge
New pregnancy bias law broadly protects workers, US agency says
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
