Walgreens paying $106.8 million to settle US prescription billing fraud charges
Adds Justice Department comment, share price, paragraphs 4, 13
By Jonathan Stempel
Sept 13 (Reuters) -Walgreens Boots Alliance WBA.O agreed to pay $106.8 million to settle charges it fraudulently billed the U.S. government for prescriptions that were never dispensed, the Department of Justice said on Friday.
The Justice Department said Walgreens violated the federal False Claims Act between 2009 and 2020 by submitting payment claims to Medicare, Medicaid and other healthcare programs for prescriptions it processed but which were never picked up.
This caused the pharmacy chain to receive tens of millions of dollars for prescriptions it never provided to patients, the department said.
"Federal health care programs provide critical health care services to millions of Americans," said Brian Boynton, head of the Justice Department's civil division. "We will hold accountable those who abuse these programs by knowingly billing for goods or services they did not provide."
Walgreens, based in Deerfield, Illinois, did not admit liability in agreeing to settle.
"Due to a software error, we inadvertently billed some government health care programs for a relatively small number of prescriptions our patients submitted but never picked up," Walgreens said in a statement.
"We corrected the error, reported the issue to the government and voluntarily refunded all overpayments."
Friday's settlement resolves three whistleblower lawsuits filed in Florida, New Mexico and Texas.
The Justice Department said the payout took into account Walgreens' cooperation and its "significant" steps to upgrade its in-house pharmacy management system to ensure that the billing problems don't happen again.
Walgreens previously refunded $66.3 million for the settled claims and is being credited for this amount.
The chain recently operated about 8,600 stores in the United States, but said in June it plans to close a significant number of underperforming stores over the next few years.
Steven Turck, a former Walgreens pharmacy manager who filed the Texas case, will receive $14.92 million from the settlement. Andrew Bustos, a former Walgreens district pharmacy supervisor who filed the New Mexico case, will receive $1.62 million.
Walgreens Boots shares closed on Friday up 37 cents, or 4.2%, at $9.21.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan Oatis and David Gregorio
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
