Visa hit with merchant class action after US Justice Dept antitrust lawsuit
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 2 (Reuters) -Visa V.N is facing a new lawsuit from U.S. merchants over its payments network, adding legal pressure on the payment card giant after the U.S. Justice Department filed a major antitrust lawsuit against it last week.
Advertising and marketing company All Wrapped Up Signs and Graphix filed the proposed class action on Tuesday in federal court in Manhattan, marking the first private antitrust case piggybacking on the sweeping claims lodged by the Biden administration.
The merchants' lawsuit, like the Justice Department’s case, accused San Francisco-based Visa of paying would-be rivals not to develop competing networks, and threatening merchants with higher fees if they try to use other platforms to process transactions.
“While merchants suffer, Visa profits,” the new lawsuit said.
Visa did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company has denied the Justice Department’s claims and vowed to fight the government's case.
Dan McCuaig, an attorney for All Wrapped Up at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, in a statement said "we look forward to vigorously representing a class of businesses harmed by Visa's anticompetitive practices."
A wave of private litigation often follows major government cases involving large companies, exposing them to potentially higher damages.
Florida-based All Wrapped Up said Visa's allegedly uncompetitive business practices allowed it to unfairly dominate the debit card market. The company said it seeks to represent a class of potentially hundreds of thousands of small and large businesses.
The lawsuit said Visa charges more than $7 billion in fees annually to merchants to process debit transactions.
The plaintiff’s law firm, Cohen Milstein, long has represented gasoline retailers in Brooklyn federal court accusing Visa and Mastercard of imposing artificially high credit card interchange, or “swipe,” fees to merchants.
The case is All Wrapped Up Signs and Graphix v. Visa, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-07435.
For plaintiff: Brent Johnson of Cohen Milstein
For defendant: No appearance yet
Read more:
Visa taps hardened D.C. duo to battle US monopoly lawsuit
US accuses Visa of monopolizing debit card swipes
Visa, Mastercard can likely handle settlement much bigger than $30 billion, judge says
Visa settles Discover unit's antitrust lawsuit over debit card network
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
