US urges dismissal of lawsuit demanding menthol cigarette ban
Adds comment from plaintiffs' lawyer, details from government filing, paragraphs 3, 6
By Jonathan Stempel
June 28 (Reuters) -The Biden administration asked a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit by anti-smoking groups demanding that it end nearly a year of delay and ban menthol cigarettes, which are used disproportionately by Blacks and younger people.
In a Thursday night court filing, the Food and Drug Administration said the delay was not unreasonable because it had yet to determine that a ban was "appropriate for the protection of the public health."
The FDAalso said the plaintiffs had no direct stake in a ban, having alleged at most "a setback to their abstract social interests," and therefore had no standing to sue.
It cited the U.S. Supreme Court's June 13 rejection of a bid by anti-abortion groups and doctors to restrict access to a widely used abortion pill.
The lawsuit was filed on April 2 in the Oakland, California federal court by the American Medical Association, the African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, Action on Smoking and Health and the National Medical Association.
In an email, their lawyer Christopher Leung expressed confidence the court would reject the FDA's "baseless" dismissal motion, saying it diverted attention from the agency's "abject failure to protect the public health."
Found naturally in peppermint and similar plants, menthol is the only cigarette flavor still allowed under a 2009 law that gave the FDA authority to regulate tobacco.
Government health officials had hoped to ban the flavor last August but have pushed back the date multiple times.
The latest delay was on April 26, when Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra suggested the matter could drag past November's election by saying talks will take "significantly more time."
Health and Human Services is the FDA's parent agency.
A ban would likely cost billions of dollars in annual revenue for cigarette companies such as Altria MO.N and British American Tobacco BATS.L.
It could also impede Black voters' support for President Joe Biden as the Democrat seeks reelection.
About 81% of Black adults who smoke cigarettes use menthol varieties, compared with just 34% of white adults, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Among cigarette smokers aged 18 to 25, 53% used menthol cigarettes, compared with 42% of smokers over 35, the CDC said.
The FDA has said eliminating menthol could prevent 324,000 to 654,000 smoking deaths in the United States over 40 years.
The case is African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-01992.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Diane Craft and Nick Zieminski
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
