US sides with Argentina in dispute over $16 billion YPF judgment
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, Nov 6 (Reuters) -The U.S. government sided with Argentina in urging a federal judge not to force the cash-strapped country to give up its 51% stake in oil and gas company YPF YPFDm.BA to partially satisfy a $16.1 billion court judgment.
In a Wednesday night letter to U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska in Manhattan, the Department of Justice said it has long argued that U.S. courts cannot order the seizure of foreign sovereign property located outside the United States.
It also said it would violate sovereign immunity to require Argentina to turn over the shares to two investors represented by litigation funder Burford Capital BURF.L, and that allowing such a turnover could interfere with U.S. foreign policy.
Argentina is appealing Preska's September 2023 decision to award the $16.1 billion to Petersen Energia Inversora and Eton Park Capital Management. Burford has said it expected to receive 35% and 73% of their respective damages.
Lawyers for Burford did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Robert Giuffra, a lawyer for Argentina, declined to comment.
Led by libertarian President Javier Milei, Argentina has slashed public spending to reduce inflation, which has fallen but remains above 200% annualized, though its measures have deepened a recession and contributed to poverty rates rising above 50%.
But Milei's ties with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump could help with Argentina's $44 billion loan program with the International Monetary Fund, which could be revisited next year.
The $16.1 billion judgment arose from Argentina's 2012 seizure of the 51% YPF stake held by Spain's Repsol REP.MC, without tendering for shares held by minority investors.
Burford has said Argentina's "many years of structuring its assets to avoid enforcement" justified turning over the YPF stake, and that a commercial activity exception to the federal Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act allowed a turnover.
In Wednesday's letter, the Justice Department said Congress did not intend when passing that law to eliminate immunity for foreign sovereign property such as the YPF shares.
It said ending immunity would create an anomaly where a foreign country's property inside the United States would have greater protection than property inside the country itself.
The Justice Department also said that for reasons of comity, meaning the respect that countries afford each other by limiting the reach of their laws, New York state's own turnover statute did not require Argentina to give up the YPF shares.
A contrary conclusion could put U.S. property at risk, the department said, because foreign countries could afford the United States similar treatment in their own courts.
It is unclear when Preska will rule.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Stephen Coates
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
