US SEC poised to allow half-penny stock pricing
By Douglas Gillison
Sept 18 (Reuters) -Wall Street's top regulator on Wednesday unveiled rules allowing stock markets to price shares in increments of half a penny, rather than the current minimum size of 1 cent, aiming to promote more competitive pricing and reduce investor costs.
The five-member U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was due to convene at 10 a.m. ET (1400 GMT) to vote on the measure, first proposed in 2022 as part of a broader package of market structure reforms. Though the SEC is often sharply divided on political lines, the commissioners unanimously proposed the pricing changes.
The rules apply to the highly technical space between the prices that stock sellers are willing to accept in a trade and what buyers are willing to pay, known as the bid-ask spread, for the multitrillion-dollar U.S. equities markets.
Allowing prices to be quoted in increments, or "tick sizes", of less than a penny will result in narrower spreads, cutting transaction costs and allowing for more aggressive pricing, according to the SEC.
Prior to the vote, SEC officials told reporters that 2023 data showed that as many as 1,700 stocks would have qualified as "tick constrained" under the rule due to be adopted, meaning a weighted average of the spread was 1.5 cents or less over a certain period.
The SEC's decision not to include pricing increments smaller than half a cent represents a likely win for industry, which had favored the half-penny increment and objected to sizes included in the 2022 proposal that were as small as a fifth or a tenth of a cent.
Market maker Citadel Securities said such small sizes threatened to reduce liquidity and worsen investor panic in times of stress. Other industry participants pointed to problems such as "queue jumping," in which buyers jump ahead of existing orders by placing bids that are only fractionally higher.
If adopted, the new rules subject to Wednesday's vote are due to take effect in November 2025.
They are part of a broader SEC effort at adopting what would be the largest market structure reforms in nearly 20 years, in part driven by the GameStop trading frenzy of 2021, in which retail traders suffered substantial losses.
The agency last year shortened the trading settlement cycle to help reduce default risk and in March of this year adopted rules requiring expanded public reporting on the quality of trade executions by broker-dealers and others.
Reporting by Douglas Gillison in Washington; Editing by Jamie Freed
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
