US prosecutors demand Google divest Chrome to end search monopoly
Nov 21 (Reuters) -U.S. prosecutors on Wednesday argued to a judge that Google GOOGL.O must sell its Chrome browser, share data, and search results with rivals, and take a range of other measures to end its monopoly on online search.
The proposals are wide-ranging, including barring Google from re-entering the browser market for five years and insisting Google sell its Android mobile operating system if other remedies fail to restore competition.
Here are some of the demands that the U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) lawyers have made in the case:
DIVEST CHROME BROWSER
Google must promptly and fully divest its Chrome browser to a buyer approved by the U.S. government.
Google's ownership of Chrome and the Android operating system poses a significant challenge to entrants and competitors, as they are the "key methods" for the distribution of search engines to consumers.
ANDROID OPERATING SYSTEM
Google may elect to fully divest Android to a buyer approved by the U.S. government. If Google chooses to retain control of Android but fails to comply with presented remedies, the government may petition the court to order the divesture of Android.
BROWSER OWNERSHIP
Google should be prohibited from owning a browser or having any investment in a search or search text ad rival, search distributor, or rival query-based AI product or ads technology for five years after the divestiture of Chrome.
GOOGLE SEARCH CONTRACTS
Google should be prohibited from making payments to third parties to make Google the default general search engine in their products, including ending exclusive agreements in which Google pays billions of dollars annually to Apple AAPL.O.
AGREEMENTS WITH PUBLISHERS
Google should not enter into a contract with a publisher to license data that provides the search engine giant with exclusivity to the publisher's content.
GOOGLE SEARCH PREFERENCE
Google should not use any assets it owns or operates to give preference to its own search engine, search text ads, or AI products.
DATA SHARING
Google would be required under the proposals to license search results to competitors at nominal cost and share data it gathers from users with competitors for free. It would be barred from collecting any user data that it cannot share due to privacy concerns.
Reporting by Shubham Kalia in Bengaluru; Editing by Miyoung Kim and Sonia Cheema
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
