US offshore driller asks judge to block insurers' demands for $250 mln collateral
Updates with W&T Offshore CEO comment in paragraphs 3-4
By Georgina McCartney
HOUSTON, Dec 12 (Reuters) -W&T Offshore WTI.N, an independent driller operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, has asked a federal judge to block insurance companies' demands for $250 million in additional collateral for taking apart old oil infrastructure.
The offshore drilling industry faces mounting pressure to provide bonds for decommissioning oil and gas infrastructure in federal waters. The Federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in June enforced a final rule that amended its financial assurance regulations in a bid to ensure the industry covers decommissioning costs, not the taxpayer.
"You're at the mercy of the federal agency and you're at the mercy of the surety providers, so there is really not a whole lot of control there," W&T Offshore CEO Tracy Krohn told Reuters in an interview.
"The regulatory agency has no real basis for requiring a great deal more bonding than what they already have," Krohn added.
The BOEM estimates offshore drillers would collectively pay just under $7 billion as a result of the final rule, innew supplemental financial assurances to cover the potential costs of decommissioning activities.
As of June 2023, more than 2,700 wells and 500 platforms were overdue for decommissioning in the Gulf of Mexico, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
In the lawsuit, filed on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, W&T Offshore asked Judge Keith Ellison to declare that the insurers have colluded to damage the company by jointly demanding additional collateral and premiums.
The company claims the insurers used BOEM's final rule to demand additional collateral for surety, for which the operator has already paid premiums.
Houston-based W&T Offshore did not immediately provide a comment.
Endurance Assurance Corp and Lexon Insurance Co, both named in the suit, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Opponents said BOEM's final rule would disproportionately affect smaller companies that lack investment grade ratings or sufficient proven oil reserves. Oil majors are more likely to have large reserves, or meet credit criteria exempting them from putting up more money to cover potential future decommissioning.
Days before the BOEM's final rule was enforced, Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi sued the government in a bid to block it.
The U.S. Gulf of Mexico produces roughly 1.74 million barrels per day of oil, according to the last government figures, about 13% of total U.S. output.
Reporting by Georgina McCartney in Houston; Editing by David Gregorio
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
