US Nippon Steel rebuff would be cruel and kind
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Antony Currie
MELBOURNE, Sept 10 (Reuters Breakingviews) -So much for an M&A shortcut. It looks increasingly likely that the Biden administration is about to block Nippon Steel's 5401.T $14.9 billion agreed takeover of United States Steel X.N, Reuters reported in an exclusive on Sept. 5 citing three people with knowledge of the situation. That would be both a cruel and kind blow to the Japanese company's plans to offset challenges at home and beyond.
U.S. presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump had already voiced their opposition to the tie-up. Now the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has, in a letter seen by Reuters, said the deal would damage American steel production, among other things.
Arguably the issues Nippon Steel is trying to tackle should give CFIUS some comfort. Japanese production dominates the $20 billion industrial giant's output, accounting for the vast majority of its 66 million tons a year of steelmaking capacity. But that market is shrinking, pushing Nippon boss Eiji Hashimoto to look abroad. Owning U.S. Steel would give it 20 million tons a year of capacity in a market where demand for high-grade steel is strong and where tariffs of 25% imposed on imports of the metalin 2018 have bolstered profits.
That protectionism would add a partial bulwark to Nippon's earnings against developments in China. The country's property slump has reduced demand but with little change in its 1 billion tons a year of supply. The resulting overcapacity has left the vast majority of mills unprofitable, per Macquarie, and led to a 24% increase in exports in the first half of the year to 54 million tons. Fear of cheap Chinese exportshas prompted Nippon and others to urge Tokyo to impose restrictions, Reuters reported last month.
Such concerns are good reasons for Hashimoto to leave the markets for U.S. Steel's output untouched. Last week Nippon publicly pledged to prioritise American-made metal for U.S. buyers, as well as to put a majority of U.S. citizens on his new subsidiary's board.
If the U.S. does forbid the deal, it'll leave Nippon more exposed to industry challenges and end Hashimoto's hope of quickly hitting his twin goals of 100 billion yen ($700 million)of annualunderlying profit and 100 million tons a year of capacity. But he has other options, not least to build up to 30 million tons of annualcapacity in India with joint venture partner ArcelorMittal MT.LU.
Granted, such projects will take longer. But they also won't come with the whopping 140% premium he's offering for U.S. Steel that would cap the return on investment at some 5%, Breakingviews calculates, or around Nippon's cost of capital, per LSEG. On that score at least, U.S. authorities may be doing Nippon shareholders a favour.
Follow @AntonyMCurrie on X
CONTEXT NEWS
The Biden administration told Nippon Steel in a letter on Aug. 31 that its $14.9 billion acquisition of United States Steel would pose a national security risk by harming the American steel industry, Reuters exclusively reported on Sept. 5. The three people who provided Reuters with the information added that the White House is poised to block the deal.
The two companies were given until Sept. 4 to respond.
Graphic: Nippon Steel-US Steel deal appears to be melting down https://reut.rs/4gk3o47
Editing by Robyn Mak and Aditya Srivastav
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
