US law firm Motley Rice appeals $396 mln opioid fee award
By Brendan Pierson
June 24 (Reuters) - U.S.law firm Motley Rice is appealing its award of $396 million for its work on litigation against the drug industry over the opioid crisis that resulted in $46 billion in nationwide settlements.
The firm said it would appeal the award, which represents 18.6% of a $2.13 billion pool of fees to be divided among dozens of law firms, in a notice filed Friday in Cleveland federal court. It did not say how much it was asking for or on what basis it was challenging the award.
Motley Rice had already won a bump in fees after objecting earlier in the allocation process, up from 17.2%, or $366 million, according to a June 7 court filing.
The firm did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Several other firms have secured awards in the hundreds of millions of dollars and have not appealed them.
Other firms that filed notices of appeal are Spangenberg Shibley & Liber; Kelley Ferraro; Crueger Dickinson; Stranch, Jennings & Garvey; and Weisman, Kennedy & Berris. All of those firms received less than 2% of the funds.
The fees stem from settlements that local and Native American tribal governments have reached with drugmakers Johnson & Johnson JNJ.N, AbbVie ABBV.N and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries TEVA.TA; distributors Cencora COR.N, McKesson MCK.N and Cardinal Health CAH.N; and pharmacies CVS CVS.N, Walgreens Boots Alliance WBA.O and Walmart WMT.N.
They do not include a settlement of up to $6 billion with bankrupt OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma, which is funded by that company's Sackler family owners in exchange for a shield from future lawsuits. The U.S. Supreme Court is currently weighing whether that settlement is legal.
Opioid settlements, including both the nationwide deals and separate agreements negotiated by individual states, now total well over $50 billion. However, many state and local governments have yet to develop detailed plans for how they will spend the money to remedy the harms caused by opioids.
More than 800,000 people in the United States died of opioid overdoses from 1999 through 2023, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Plaintiffs in the lawsuits say that drugmakers downplayed the drugs' risks, and that distributors and pharmacies ignored red flags that they were being diverted into illegal channels, fueling an epidemic of addiction.
Read more:
Top law firms in US opioid lawsuits to get hundreds of millions in fees
US Supreme Court torn over Purdue Pharma bankruptcy settlement
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
