XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

US House Republicans demand regulatory reviews after Supreme Court ruling



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US House Republicans demand regulatory reviews after Supreme Court ruling</title></head><body>

By Moira Warburton

WASHINGTON, July 10 (Reuters) -Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives have asked all federal agencies to begin reviews of regulations that could be affected by a recent Supreme Court ruling overturning a legal precedent known as "Chevron deference," in letters released on Wednesday.

Three House committees - Agriculture, Oversight, and Education and Workforce - targeted agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Labor in what the chamber's No. 2 Republican, Steve Scalise, called a "fight to free the American people from the power-hungry administrative state."

The letters follow a Supreme Court ruling in June that struck down the so-called Chevron deference. The latter refers to a 1984 precedent involving oil company Chevron CVX.N that gave government experts the final say in how laws passed by Congress should be interpreted.

Conservatives have insisted for decades that the ruling gave too much power to government bureaucrats over elected lawmakers.

The letters from the three committees' chairs requested lists of existing regulations that were challenged in court and upheld based on the Chevron deference, as well as pending rules that could have been defended using the Chevron deference.

The chairs also asked for a list of rules that could have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, a "major increase in costs or prices for consumers," or "significant adverse effects" on competition and employment, among other factors.

The requests could provide a road map for conservative activists to sue agencies over specific regulations.

Michael Regan, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, told the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday that the court's decision "hits the EPA extremely hard."


Explainer: What is Chevron deference and why did the Supreme Court overturn it? https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-industry-wants-see-voldemort-administrative-law-die-2024-06-11/


Reporting by Moira Warburton in Washington
Editing by Scott Malone and Matthew Lewis

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.