US House lawmakers seek antitrust probe of OPEC and oil companies
Adds comment from Exxon paragraph 7
By Timothy Gardner
WASHINGTON, June 4 (Reuters) -A group of Democratic U.S. House lawmakers asked the Justice Department on Tuesday to probe allegations of antitrust behavior among U.S. oil producers and OPEC and said the two largest U.S oil companies have been conspiring to keep fuel prices high.
Nine House of Representatives Democrats, in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, cited a complaint by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in May alleging the former CEO of Pioneer Resources engaged in an "outrageous scheme... to coordinate pricing between U.S. oil companies and foreign producers."
The letter, led by Jerrold Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, also cited the big profits earned last year by Exxon Mobil Corp XOM.N and Chevron CVX.N, the two largest U.S. oil companies.
"Major oil producers appear to be colluding with each other and foreign cartels to keep prices high, padding their profits at the expense of American consumers," the lawmakers said.
"We urge you to use the full authority of the Department of Justice to investigate and, where necessary, prosecute this anticompetitive conduct," the letter said.
On Exxon and Chevron, the lawmakers said the oil giants had apparently"been lining their own pockets while conspiring to keep prices high" instead of passing those profits through to consumers in the form of cheaper products.
Exxon said the FTC's allegations are "entirely inconsistent with how we do business."
Chevron did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In addition to Nadler, the letter was signed by Henry Jackson, Pramila Jayapal and seven other Democrats.
Last month, the FTC approved ExxonMobil's $60 billion purchase of Pioneer Natural Resources, but barred former Pioneer CEO Scott Sheffield from Exxon's board on allegations he attempted to collude with OPEC to raise oil prices.
Late last month, U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and 22 of his Democratic colleagues sent a similar letter to Garland.
Sheffield coordinated efforts with U.S. shale oil producers to constrain their output and raise energy prices, the FTC said on May 2.
Sheffield, known for his long tenure and frank comments on industry output and spending, used his influence "to align oil production across the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico with OPEC+," a production group that includes Russia as well as OPEC members, the FTC said at the time.
Sheffield's lawyers have referred to comments made last month, when Sheffield asked the FTC to dismiss the ban. "At no time did government officials and Mr. Sheffield exchange competitively sensitive information," said Sheffield's counsel Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton.
Reporting by Timothy Gardner and Susan Heavey; Editing by Leslie Adler and Lincoln Feast.
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
