US FTC to sue drug middlemen over insulin prices, source says
Adds Novo declining comment, background on insulin
By Jody Godoy and Mariam Sunny
July 10 (Reuters) -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is planning to sue UnitedHealth UNH.N, Cigna CI.N and CVS Health CVS.N over their tactics as middlemen in negotiating prices for drugs including insulin, a person familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.
The three companies own the largest pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, which are being investigated for the rebates, or volume-based discounts, they negotiate with drug manufacturers, and how these influence drug access and pricing.
CVS said the company intends to defend itself vigorously. UnitedHealth declined to comment; Cigna was not immediately available for comment.
"Any action that limits the use of these PBM negotiating tools would reward the pharmaceutical industry and return the market to a broken state, leaving American businesses and patients at the mercy of the prices drugmakers set," a CVS spokesperson said.
The FTC is also looking at drugmakers as part of the insulin probe, the source said. The three largest insulin makers include Sanofi SASY.PA, Novo Nordisk NOVOb.CO and Eli Lilly LLY.N.
Sanofi said its pricing practices have always complied with the law and that the company is committed to helping patients access the medicine they need at the lowest possible price.
Novo declined to comment and Lilly did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment.
U.S. President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act capped insulin prices for government-backed Medicare insurance recipients at $35 per month but that cap does not apply to patientswith private insurance or without insurance.
Americans without health insurance pay an average of $98 for Eli Lilly’s generic insulin despite the company’s May 1 pledge to cut its list price to $25 per vial, according to a survey of more than 300 U.S. pharmacies by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s office released a year ago.
As of 2023, around 8.4 million people in the United States with diabetes used insulin, according to the American Diabetes Association.
Insulin is vital for patients with type 1 diabetes to control their blood sugar and for some patients with the more common type 2 diabetes.
On Tuesday, the FTC issued an interim report, saying the three biggest middlemen - managing 79% of U.S. prescription drug claims - have used years of dealmaking to gain outsized influence on drug prices. The report said the companies enriched themselves at the expense of smaller pharmacies and consumers.
UnitedHealth's Optum unit, CVS Health's CVS Caremark and Cigna's Express Scripts all disputed the report's findings.
Reporting by Mariam Sunny in Bengaluru and Jody Godoy in New York; Editing by Maju Samuel and David Gregorio
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
