US forecasts record soy crop after farmers ditch corn
By Heather Schlitz
Aug 14 (Reuters) -The U.S. government increased its soybean forecast to a record high this week as farmers switched acres from higher-cost corn in a year when farm incomes are expected to plunge.
Flooding that prevented corn planting in some areas and a swift winter-wheat harvest that enabled some farmers to plant a second crop of soybeans are other factors behind the bigger-than expected forecast, farmers and analysts said.
On Monday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture raised its estimate for the 2024/25 soybean crop to a record 4.589 billion bushels from 4.469 previously.
The revised forecast from the world's second-biggest soybean producer heightened expectations for a big global supply of the oilseed, used to make biofuels and livestock feed. Large corn and soy crops globally, as well as feeble demand from exporters and domestic processors, have driven prices to near four-year lows.
USDA increased its estimate of how much soy will be left over in the U.S. by autumn 2025, after export and domestic needs are covered, by a whopping 29% from last month to 560 million bushels.
Planting corn requires farmers to apply nitrogen and other costly fertilizers, which farmers said would not allow them to make a profit given low corn prices.
"You're thinking, 'what am I going to lose less money on,' and soybeans were that option," Cordt Holub, a corn and soy farmer in east-central Iowa, said. "When you're planting corn, it's a lot higher management and more steps that have to take place. With soy, you can basically just go and slap some soybeans into the ground and watch them grow."
In parts of the Midwest, widespread flooding delayed spring planting long enough that some farmers opted to plant soy, which can be planted later than corn.
USDA raised its estimate for acres planted with soybeans and cut its corn-planting estimate, though in some states with extreme flooding, such as South Dakota, soybean acreage expanded by much more than it did nationally.
Chris Gibbs, a corn and soy farmer in western Ohio, decreased his corn acreage by 20% from what he initially planned and planted more soybeans instead due to the lower fertilizer costs and greater chance of profitability.
"I calculated that I had a better chance of making money by growing soy rather than corn," Gibbs said. "There's been little opportunity to make a profit this year."
In some Midwest and Plains states, a speedy winter-wheat harvest allowed some farmers time to plant soybeans for a second crop.
"When times are tough, you see if you can grow two crops in one year," said Arlan Suderman, chief commodities economist at StoneX.
Reporting by Heather Schlitz; Editing by Rod Nickel
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
