US appeals court lets Texas keep river barrier against illegal border crossings
Adds comment from Texas governor in paragraphs 5-7
By Daniel Wiessner
July 31 (Reuters) -Texas can keep a 1,000-foot (300-meter) long floating barrier in the Rio Grande to deter illegal border crossings by migrants at the river separating the United States and Mexico, a U.S. appeals court has ruled, rejecting a challenge by President Joe Biden's administration.
The full New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday reversed a preliminary injunction granted by a lower court that required Texas to move the string of wrecking ball-sized buoys it placed in a shallow area of the river.
The ruling was a victory for Republican Texas officials including Governor Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton and a blow to Biden's administration, which is locked in several legal battles with Texas and other Republican-led states over their efforts to crack down on illegal border crossings. The administration has called the state actions an unlawful intrusion on federal authority to set immigration policy.
The 5th Circuit's decision allows Texas to keep the barrier in place pending the outcome of the Biden administration's lawsuit accusing the state of violating a U.S. environmental law.
Abbott criticized Biden for trying to force the removal of the buoys and celebrated the decision in a post on social media.
"I fought to keep them in the water. That is exactly where they will stay," Abbott wrote on Tuesday night. "JUSTICE!!!!"
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Texas-based U.S. District Judge David Ezra in April refused to dismiss the lawsuit and had directed Texas to move the barrier to the U.S. side of the river pending the outcome of the Biden administration's lawsuit seeking to remove it. A trial in the case is scheduled to start next week.
The lawsuit accused Texas of violating a U.S. environmental law requiring states to receive federal approval before building obstructions in navigable waters. Ferries and some government vessels operate near the shallow, rocky area of the Rio Grande where Texas installed the barrier, according to court filings.
The full 5th Circuit agreed to hear the case after a divided three-judge panel sided with the Biden administration in December. Twelve of the court's 17 active judges are appointees of Republican presidents, but two of the three judges on that panel were appointed by Democrats.
In Wednesday's opinion, the full 5th Circuit said the lower court "clearly erred in finding that the United States will likely prove that the barrier is in a navigable stretch of the Rio Grande."
The floating barrier is part of Abbott's broader effort to deter and punish illegal border crossings, collectively known as Operation Lone Star.
Texas is also involved in legal battles over its placement of razor-wire fencing on private property along the border and a law passed last year authorizing state officials to arrest, prosecute and deport people who cross the border illegally.
The Biden administration has also sued Iowa and Oklahoma for passing similar laws, which it has said interfere with federal enforcement of U.S immigration laws. Judges have blocked all three states' laws pending the outcome of the lawsuits.
Republicans, favoring a hardline approach toward illegal immigration, have criticized Biden's policies as lax and have accused him of allowing a crisis to worsen along the U.S.-Mexican border.
Biden administration, Texas duel in US appeals court over floating migrant barrier nL1N3HH3C7
EXPLAINER-US border security: What could Biden, Congress and Texas do? nL6N3GJ0ID
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Additional reporting by Kristina Cooke; Editing by Will Dunham, Alexia Garamfalvi and Chizu Nomiyama
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
