XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

US anti-trust trial in Tapestry bid for Capri ends, judge's decision awaited



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US anti-trust trial in Tapestry bid for Capri ends, judge's decision awaited</title></head><body>

By Siddharth Cavale

NEW YORK, Sept 30 (Reuters) -The U.S. anti-trust trial over the $8.5 billion bid by luxury goods maker Tapestry TPR.N to buy Capri CPRI.N concluded on Monday, with Tapestry lawyers citing an "intensely competitive" handbag market in defending against claims that consumers would face higher prices.

At the New York trial, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sought to prove in its closing arguments that the deal to bring six brands - Tapestry's Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman with Capri's Versace, Jimmy Choo, and Michael Kors - into a single company would leave shoppers with fewer, more expensive handbags than if the companies were separate.

FTC counsel Abby Dennis tried to draw parallels between the multiple transportation methods to get to Washington D.C. from New York - such as buses, trains, planes and even helicopters - but how difficult it is for consumers to interchange between those options because of price limitations. She said Americans face the same challenges with handbags.

A U.S. federal judge will decide whether to block the merger that was announced in August 2023, or allow it to proceed. A decision could be expected anywhere between three weeks to three months, according to Tapestry.

"The judge... has an avalanche of material thrown at her and needs some time to think through it. You cannot say this one is in the bag for either of the parties," said James Weingarten, a former FTC chief trial counsel, who now works in Washington D.C. at law firm Milbank.

Over seven days of evidentiary proceedings, lawyers for both sides spent considerable time focused on defining the so-called "accessible luxury" marketplace. While the FTC relied on an expert witness, economist Loren Smith, to evaluate the market, lawyers for Tapestry poked holes in the financial modeling and methodology used to define the market. Tapestry's lead counsel Lawrence Buterman on Monday requested the judge completely disregard the analysis.

"The FTC can't meet their burden under any standard," Buterman said in closing, asking the judge to allow the merger to proceed.



Reporting by Siddharth Cavale in New York; Editing by Vanessa O'Connell and Chris Reese

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.