UniCredit-ECB spat could sharpen watchdog’s teeth
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Liam Proud
LONDON, July 10 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Andrea Orcel’s last big courtroom battle, over a rescinded CEO job offer from Banco Santander SAN.MC, was a source of entertainment for rival bank executives. Now UniCredit CRDI.MI, the lender he runs, has mounted a legal challenge over demands by regulators at the European Central Bank for a quicker exit from Russia. The case could have consequences for the supervisor’s approach to other issues like climate change.
Orcel’s 60 billion euro bank is fighting the ECB, which recently ordered the lender to get out of Russia faster. UniCredit said last week that it had concerns about the terms on which a quicker shrinkage would take place and is asking the General Court of the European Union to opine on whether the ECB’s action has a solid legal basis.
Orcel has already shrunk UniCredit’s Russian gross customer loans by about three-quarters between December 2021 and March 2024 to about 3 billion euros. But the ECB wants him to pick up the pace, fearing a reputational or operational hit if UniCredit stays in the heavily sanctioned country.
Orcel’s bank, according to a person familiar with the case, worries that trying to quit abruptly could anger Russian authorities and lead them to confiscate its assets. That risk is clear and tangible, it will argue, while the ECB’s concerns are hypothetical and unquantifiable, which makes the order disproportionately punitive.
Worryingly for Orcel, European judges have tended to favour the ECB. The regulator has won about 75% of the General Court challenges brought by banks, a person familiar with the process told Breakingviews. If that happens again in the UniCredit case, it ought to grab other lenders’ attention.
The ECB’s main concerns over UniCredit’s Russian business are hypothetical, such as the possibility of Orcel’s bank accidentally processing payments for a sanctioned person. While that risk has not yet materialised, the ECB thinks the danger is acute enough to want UniCredit to radically cut back its business. A similar line of thinking could apply to the watchdog’s green policies: loan losses from climate change haven’t generally happened yet, but the ECB is still considering fines for banks that have been slow to reassess their exposure to polluting companies.
Banks would likely dispute any charges in court, but their cases may be weakened if UniCredit’s action establishes a precedent for the ECB to penalise hypothetical, hard-to-quantify risks. Moreover, a victory against Orcel could even embolden the supervisor to take a tougher stance when handing down fines. Whether they agree with Orcel or not, bank executives have a stake in his case.
Follow @Breakingviews on X
CONTEXT NEWS
UniCredit said on July 1 that it had applied to the General Court of the European Union to seek clarity over the requests made by the European Central Bank to cut its Russia exposure.
The Italian lender run by Andrea Orcel has concerns about the terms set out by the ECB, which it thinks may go beyond the supervisor’s legal framework.
“While this application is being heard, UniCredit has requested an interim suspension of the decision pending the proceeding,” the company said in a statement.
Graphic: UniCredit’s shrinking gross customer loans in Russia https://reut.rs/45Ru0od
Editing by Neil Unmack and Oliver Taslic
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
