XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

UK water companies must improve without big bill rises, regulator says



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 4-UK water companies must improve without big bill rises, regulator says</title></head><body>

Ofwat sets average bill rise at 21% vs 33% requested

Water UK says Ofwat investment proposal not enough

Government sets out tighter regulation plans

Adds sewage spills reduction in paragraph 9, Thames Water response in paragraphs 12-13

By Sarah Young and Paul Sandle

LONDON, July 11 (Reuters) - Britain's regulator told water companies they needed to fix leaks and cut sewage spills without raising bills as much as they had wanted, prompting industry criticism it was failing to get to grips with the mounting crisis.

The trade-off between price hikes, private investment and cleaner rivers amid a funding crisis and public anger over pollution is a test for the new Labour government, as the biggest supplier Thames Water teeters on the brink of financial collapse and could need to be nationalised.

Over the next five years, regulator Ofwatsaid it would allow companies to increase average bills by 21%, or 94 pounds ($121), to fund an88 billion pounds infrastructure upgrade.

The water companies said that was not enough to tackle sewage spills, fix leaking pipes and increase capacity for a growing population.They had wantedto raisebills by an average of 33%, to invest 105 billion pounds.

Britain's water industry has been in the firing line over the amount of sewage dumped in its waterways,with critics saying the companies have under-invested for decades while taking out billions of pounds in dividends and paying large bonuses to executives.


'MINIMUM ASK ON CUSTOMERS'

Ofwat bossDavid Black told Times Radio the system needssustained improvements "but it does need to be done in a way that puts the minimum ask on customers that's possible."

He said the plan would cut sewage spills by 44% by 2030.

Industry body Water UK slammed Ofwat's proposals, accusing it of failing to tacklecrumbling pipes and sewage spills.

"For far too long, Ofwat has failed to be realistic about the levels of investment needed and what it will take to deliver and maintain necessary infrastructure," a spokesperson said.

Thames Water, at the centre of the debate about a water industry which was privatised in 1989, wanted to hike bills by a total of 191 pounds over five years, but Ofwat said it would allow a rise of 99 pounds.

The company said its original plan had been "ambitious, deliverable, financeable and investible". It will now provide more evidence before the regulator's final decision in December.

Struggling under 15 billion pounds of debt, Thames said on Tuesday it would run out of money next year if it did not raise 3.25 billion pounds of equity.


GOVERNMENT REFORM

Environment minister Steve Reed, appointed after Britain's July 4 election, ordered Ofwatto ensure new fundingwas ringfenced and not spent on bonuses or dividends.

Reed, who will meet water bosses later on Thursday, said he would outline steps in the next months to reform the sector and restore British "rivers, lakes and seas to good health."

The crisis poses a challenge for newPrime Minister Keir Starmer who wantsto boost private investment in Britain, withinvestors looking at water as a test case.

Ofwat set the allowed rate of return paid to investors of water companies at 3.72%, indexed to inflation, saying thatwould be adequateto attract investment.

It imposed a new "turnaround oversight regime" on Thames, requiring it to provide regular updates on progress.

Ofwat's Black told reporters that in time, Thames Water could consider breaking itself up or floating on public markets, but said neither was an immediate solution.

Hours before Ofwat's announcement, credit rating firm S&P Global warned it could downgrade Thames' Class A and B debt to 'junk' ratings, making them uninvestible for big pension funds.

Ofwat will publish its final decision on bills and investment on Dec. 19. The companies can refer their case to the competition regulatorif they cannot reach agreement with Ofwat.

($1 = 0.7777 pounds)



Writing by Sarah Young, additional reporting by Marc Jones; Editing by Paul Sandle, Kate Holton and Bernadette Baum

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.