UK pensions changes may favour bigger fund managers, executives say
Megafunds consolidation to provide up to 80 billion pounds in investment
Larger schemes better equipped to invest in UK economy, says pensions regulator
Specialist asset managers may be frozen out due to higher fees, experts warn
By Carolyn Cohn and Iain Withers
LONDON, Nov 14 (Reuters) -Britain's plans to bulk up local government and private employer pension schemes into 'megafunds' to boost domestic investment are likely to benefit larger asset managers over smaller, more specialist ones, industry executives said.
The megafunds' consolidation will provide Britain with up to 80 billion pounds ($101.35 billion) in fresh investment firepower, Rachel Reeves said on Wednesday. She was speaking ahead of her first Mansion House address to City of London leaders, scheduled for later on Thursday.
Britain's pensions regulator welcomed the proposed reforms, saying larger schemes would be better equipped to invest in the UK economy.
Amanda Blanc, chief executive of FTSE 100 insurer and pensions provider Aviva AV.L also said the proposals would "help get more savers into larger schemes that can offer better value and more opportunities for productive investment".
Aviva, which says it is Britain's largest workplace pension provider, manages 124 billion pounds in defined contribution (DC) pension pots, paid into by private sector employers and employees.
The DC pensions market currently totals more than 500 billion pounds, and is expected to grow rapidly.
While larger funds can typically use economies of scale to pay lower fees to the asset managers which invest their funds, the consolidation plans risked freezing out specialist asset managers that typically invest in riskier assets and charge higher fees, said Anne Glover, chief executive of venture capital firm Amadeus Capital Partners.
Pooled funds should "find a way to accommodate the industry standard fee structures and compensation mechanisms of venture capital, which rely on successful outliers to deliver outstanding performance for underlying investors," she said.
Moreover, focusing on cost-saving could be counterproductive, said Simeon Willis, chief investment officer of consultants XPS, as specialist sectors such as private markets, whose managers typically charge higher fees, could offer better returns for investors.
Consolidation of the 350 billion pound local government pensions sector would require less of a shake-up, executives said. Pooling in that space is already under way, following reforms made by former finance minister George Osborne in 2015.
Britain's ruling Labour party has said it would like to see local government pension scheme (LGPS) pools managed in-house. The investments in most pooled LGPS funds are currently farmed out to external asset managers.
Managing LGPS pools in-house could mean existing LGPS asset managers lose out, said Iain Campbell, head of LGPS Investment at consultants Hymans Robertson.
However, Paul Myles, head of LGPS at Schroders SDR.L, said the asset manager had won mandates from existing pooled LGPS funds and that increased consolidation would "further underscore the importance of deep investment expertise".
($1 = 0.7893 pounds)
Editing by William Maclean
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
