Ubisoft activist investor says it has support of 10% of shareholders in management tussle
By Zaheer Kachwala
Sept 26 (Reuters) -An activist investor pushing for a sale of "Assassin's Creed" maker Ubisoft UBIP.PA has gathered support from 10% of the French videogame publisher's shareholders, it said in a letter on Thursday that was exclusively shared with Reuters.
AJ Investments, which has less than 1% stake in Ubisoft, said it was in talks with private equity firms for its push.
"We call on the management of Ubisoft to allow the sale of the company to third parties or private equity firms at a fair price," the Slovakia-based activist investor said in the letter, which would be made public later in the day.
AJ Investments did not name the investors in its letter and declined a Reuters request for the names of the investors.
The move comes weeks after AJ Investments called for a CEO change at Ubisoft and urged it to go private or be sold.
The company's shares have declined more than 30% so far this month after the letter from AJ Investments dated Sept. 9 and following Ubisoft's announcement that the release of the next "Assassin's Creed" game would be delayed by three months.
For the year, the stock is down about 50%, underperforming rivals such as Electronic Arts EA.O, Take-Two Interactive Software TTWO.O and Capcom 9697.T.
The "Assassin's Creed" delay follows a poor run of form in the past two years for the family-run publisher with games such as "Skull and Bones" and "Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora", which have fallen short of the expectations of investors and analysts.
Ubisoft is run by its founders, the Guillemot family, which owns 15% of the firm, followed by Chinese gaming giant Tencent 0700.HK, which owns just under 10%, according to LSEG data.
The Guillemot family, Ubisoft and Tencent did not respond to requests for comment.
Ubisoft's newly released "Star Wars Outlaws" had a strong launch last month but sales have slowed since then, analysts have said.
The underperformance has sparked questions about Ubisoft's strategy of launching new licensed intellectual property at a time when gamers are sticking with already proven titles.
"The focus should be much more on existing intellectual property (IP) and leveraging the strengths they have. It's a risky time to make more than $100 million bets on new IP or licensed IP that hasn't proven itself as a game yet," said Karl Kontus, co-founder of data analytics firm Video Game Insights.
AJ Investments said it would speak with Ubisoft's management on Tuesday to discuss its proposals.
Ubisoft shares lag other major videogame publishers https://reut.rs/3XV5dxm
Reporting by Zaheer Kachwala in Bengaluru; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.