Trump’s tariff gambit doesn’t have to make sense
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own. Updates to add graphic.
By Hudson Lockett
HONG KONG, Nov 26 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Economists had expected Donald Trump’s new tariffs would be reined in by common sense, they were wrong. On Monday evening, the U.S. president-elect pledged across-the-board tariffs of 25% on Mexico and Canada, blaming America’s neighbours for failing to halt flows of illicit drugs and undocumented immigrants across their borders. He also promised a fresh 10% tariff on China, a developer of the chemical ingredients of fentanyl, until flows of the opioid are halted.
As a naked exercise of power, the move is canny; Trump is delivering on a campaign promise to tackle drug and people flows by making the problems an immediate corporate concern for global companies. Many of those were counting on protection from the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement which Trump signed in 2020, a trade deal his new pronouncement seems to violate. About a quarter of European carmaker Stellantis' STLAM.MI North American sales are made in Mexico, while Asian peers Honda 7267.T and Toyota 7203.T will also be hit. South Korea's Samsung 005930.KS has also boosted investment in the country in recent years.
The levies are more than double the 10% hit many economists expected Trump to impose on most countries once he enters office on Jan. 20. His move makes clear that America’s approach to bilateral relations is edging closer to the openly transactional approach of China, which rarely hesitates from leveraging its trading relationships to extract concessions from countries it views as misbehaving.
The initial 10% hike on China, then, gives the People's Republic a taste of its own medicine. It may also put extra pressure on companies like Temu owner PDD Holdings PDD.O, which has relied on de minimis shipments through Mexico to access the American market.
Optimists will point to the hike on Chinese goods as a sign that the worst-case scenario of 60% blanket levies may not come to pass. Goldman Sachs on Nov. 15 forecast an increase of 20 percentage points as its base case, so the new hike, if it materialises, would ostensibly take China halfway there.
But Trump’s language suggests this move is unrelated to his longtime complaint about the country’s trade surplus with America, nor its failure to buy an additional $200 billion in American goods as promised in a trade truce both sides signed in 2021.
There is an element of hypocrisy to that logic but this was not unusual during the last Trump administration. It’s only common sense to expect more of the same this time round.
Follow @KangHexin on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Donald Trump on Nov. 25 pledged to impose additional 10% tariffs on Chinese products and 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada over what the U.S. president-elect described as those countries’ failure to deal with flows of fentanyl and undocumented migrants to the United States.
Trump,who takes office on Jan. 20, said in posts on Truth Social that the levies on China were in response to the country’s failure to impose the death penalty on drug traffickers dealing in fentanyl. He said the levies on Mexico and Canada would remain in place until flows of immigrants and drugs to the United States were ended. The comments are among his most specific since winning the Nov. 5 election on promises to "put America first".
Graphics: Trump's new tariffs target major exporters to the US https://reut.rs/4fJmlN5
Editing by Una Galani and Ujjaini Dutta
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
