XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Thousands of workers at UK retailer Next win equal pay case



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Thousands of workers at UK retailer Next win equal pay case</title></head><body>

LONDON, Aug 27 (Reuters) -More than 3,500 current and former shop workers at British retailer Next NXT.L have won a six-year legal fight for equal pay, lawyers representing the claimants said on Tuesday.

An Employment Tribunal ruled that Next had failed to show that paying its sales consultants, who are overwhelmingly women, lower pay rates than its warehouse workers was not sex discrimination, said Leigh Day, the law firm representing workers.

Workers in the claim would be entitled to back pay for up to six years before they brought the action and for the time since, a total estimated to be more than 30 million pounds ($39.6 million), it said.

Leigh Day said the ruling would be a "huge encouragement" for 112,000 staff it was representing in similar cases at companies like Asda, Tesco TSCO.L, Sainsbury's SBRY.L, Morrisons and Co-op, although each would be decided on its own facts.

A tribunal in Leeds, northern England, had ruled in 2023 that the work done by the women in Next stores was equal to the work in the warehouse in terms of the demands involved.

Helen Scarsbrook, one of the three lead claimants, said: "It has been a long six years battling for the equal pay we all felt we rightly deserved but today we can say we won."

Leigh Day partner Elizabeth George said the claim was exactly the type of discrimination that equal pay legislation was intended to address.

"When you have female dominated jobs being paid less than male dominated jobs and the work is equal, employers cannot pay women less simply by pointing to the market and saying – it is the going rate for the jobs," she said.

The tribunal found that Next could have afforded to pay a higher rate but chose not to and that the reason for that was purely financial, she said.

Next said the tribunal had rejected the majority of the claims, including all claims of direct discrimination and bonus pay.

"In respect of the specific terms in which the Claim succeeded, it is our intention to Appeal," it said in a statement.

"This is the first equal pay group action in the private sector to reach a decision at Tribunal level and raises a number of important points of legal principle."




($1 = 0.7579 pounds)



Reporting by Paul Sandle; Editing by Aurora Ellis

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.