Thailand's extra $3.4 bln budget for stimulus clears first parliamentary vote
Opposition lawmakers say handout plan is unnecessary, risky
Thai economy lagging regional peers
Without stimulus, there will be crisis - finance minister
Recasts with bill passing first vote
By Orathai Sriring and Thanadech Staporncharnchai
BANGKOK, July 17 (Reuters) -The Thai government's additional 122 billion baht ($3.4 billion) budget bill for the 2024 fiscal year to finance its signature stimulus programme passed its first parliamentary vote on Wednesday.
After a one-day debate by lawmakers to scrutinise the much-criticised handout scheme, the budget passed with 297 votes in favour and 164 against as the Pheu Thai Party-led government commands a majority in the House of Representatives.
The budget will still need to pass second and third readings in the lower house, expected on July 31, before being sent for senate and royal approval.
"The government needs the budget to stimulate the economy by boosting money circulation in various areas," Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin told parliament.
The 500 billion-baht ($13.9 billion) scheme is aimed at jump-starting Southeast Asia's second-largest economy, which grew only 1.9% last year and has trailed regional peers.
Srettha said the economy was expected to grow 2.5% this year and extra budget spending would adhere to fiscal discipline.
The scheme, a giveaway of 10,000 baht each to 50 million Thais to be spent locally, has been delayed to the fourth quarter of this year due to issues finding funding sources.
"There is a need to stimulate the economy," Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira said during the parliamentary debate.
"If nothing is done, there will definitely be a crisis."
The government said on Monday it had the approval of an intra-agency committee to use 2024 and 2025 budgets for the so -called "digital wallet" programme.
The panel includes members of the central bank, which has voiced concern about the programme and has recommended it be more narrow and focused on the poor.
The stimulus plan was the Pheu Thai Party's flagship policy in the 2023 election and has been criticised by economists and two former central bank governors for being fiscally risky, which the government rejects.
Opposition lawmaker Sirikanya Tansakul questioned whether the handout programme was necessary and said the funds could be better kept for emergencies.
"We increase the fiscal risks for the country. Right now, we don't have room to deal with emergency situations," Sirikanya said during the debate.
The budget debate comes as Srettha faces a Constitutional Court case that could potentially lead to his dismissal over one of his cabinet appointments. The prime minister denies wrongdoing.
($1 = 36.04 baht)
Reporting by Orathai Sriring, Thanadech Staporncharnchai and Panarat Thepgumpanat; Editing by Martin Petty and Emelia Sithole-Matarise
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
