XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Tesla racked up greenhouse emissions credits in 2023 as other automakers lagged



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Tesla racked up greenhouse emissions credits in 2023 as other automakers lagged</title></head><body>

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON, Nov 25 (Reuters) -Tesla TSLA.O generated nearly 34 million metric tons of greenhouse gas credits in the 2023 model year by selling electric vehicles, as the auto industry racked up significant credit deficits in the face of more stringent emissions standards.

In a report first seen by Reuters, the Environmental Protection Agency said Monday new vehicle fuel economy increased by 1.1 miles (1.8 km) per gallon in 2023, reaching a record high 27.1 mpg (43.6 kpg). The EPA said fleetwide fuel economy is preliminarily projected to rise to 28 mpg (45.1 kpg)in the 2024 model year.

The industry as a whole generated nearly 11 million metric tons, or megagrams, of greenhouse gas emission credit deficits, led by General Motors, which posted a 17.8 million-metric ton deficit.

GM purchased about 44 million credits in 2023, the EPA report said, while Tesla sold about 34 million, the largest of all transactions.

Excluding Tesla, automakers generated a deficit of 43.5 million credits in 2023. By contrast in 2022, the industry earned a total of 3 million credits, led by Tesla's 19.1 million credits.

EPA said the industry still has a total surplus of 123 million metric tons of credits to meet future requirements.

GM also had to forfeit another 49 million metric tons of credits as part of a settlement in July of an EPA investigation that found excess emissions from approximately 5.9 million GM vehicles.

Reuters reported last week that President-elect Donald Trump's incoming administration plans to target federal regulations that aim to make automobiles more fuel-efficient and incentivize a shift toward electric vehicles, citing sources.

In March, the EPA finalized new rules requiring automakers to cut emissions by 49% by 2032 over 2026 levels compared with 56% under the proposal last year after dramatically tightening 2024 through 2026 requirements.

Stellantis had the lowest fuel economy of major automakers, followed by GM and Ford F.N, while Tesla is the most efficient followed by Kia 000270.KS and Hyundai 005380.KS.

Last year, Reuters reported Stellantis and GM had paid a total of $363 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements.

Horsepower, vehicle weight and size all hit new records in 2023. Sedans and wagons sold fell to just 25% of vehicles sold in 2023, while SUVs rose to 58%.

EPA said electric and plug-in electric production rose from 6.7% in 2022 to 11.5% in 2023 and projected it to reach 14.8% in 2024.



Reporting by David Shepardson; editing by Jonathan Oatis

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.