Southwest shareholders needn’t act like passengers
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jeffrey Goldfarb
NEW YORK, Aug 14 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Airplane passengers tolerate a lot of discomfort because of their limited choices. Shareholders often suffer similarly even though they’re not equally constrained. Southwest Airlines LUV.N, the discount carrier that Elliot Investment Management has turned into a battlefield, shows it doesn’t have to be that way.
The rabble-rousing hedge fund firm on Tuesday threatened to nominate 10 candidates, including the former chief executives of Air Canada AC.TO and Virgin America, to Southwest’s 15-person board. With an 11% stake in the $15 billion company, Elliott has the power to convene a special meeting of shareholders to advance its agenda, which ultimately involves ousting boss Robert Jordan. Southwest effectively dug in its heels, expressing confidence in its leadership and strategic plan.
Elliott’s timing is curious. It started its public campaign in June, shortly after shareholders enthusiastically elected Southwest’s proposed slate of board members, despite the airline’s shrinking operating profit margin and huge loss in market value. Such sheep-like behavior is all too common. Through mid-July, U.S. director nominees on average had received 95.3% of the ballot, 60 basis points higher than in 2023, according to consultancy Semler Brossy.
Look closer, however, and there are signs of frustration. More than a fifth of shareholders voted against Southwest’s executive pay plans, even though advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services backed them. Moreover, eight out of 10 analysts rate the company either a “hold” or a “sell,” according to Visible Alpha, in a break with the typical deference to management that brokers provide.
Jordan has other reasons to worry too. Elliott hasn’t run a U.S. proxy battle since 2017, a sign that the many companies it targets are usually unnerved enough to make concessions. The CEOs of Starbucks SBUX.O, Johnson Controls International JCI.N and Crown Castle CCI.N also recently raised the white flag following the activist fund manager’s arrival on the scene.
On this occasion, shareholders may have to force the issue themselves if they want to shake things up. It’s a tall order. To oust a board member mid-term requires 50% support from all outstanding shares, as opposed to the mere plurality needed to win election at an annual meeting. Southwest is due to present its own plans for reviving its stock in September. Then shareholders can decide if they want to exert more influence than flyers typically do.
Follow @jgfarb on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Elliott Investment Management said on Aug. 13 that it plans to nominate 10 candidates for the board of Southwest Airlines in further pursuit of its aim to shake up the carrier.
Southwest responded on Aug. 14 that it had previously tried to engage with the activist investment firm, including arranging a meeting for early September. The company, which is being advised by Bank of America and Morgan Stanley, also said it is confident it has the right leadership team in place.
Elliott on June 10 disclosed an 11% stake in Southwest and urged changes to senior leadership as well as the board, currently made up of 15 directors.
The fund manager’s director candidates include former Ryanair Deputy CEO Michael Cawley, former Virgin America CEO David Cush and former Air Canada CEO Robert Milton.
Graphic: Southwest shareholders expressed only some displeasure https://reut.rs/4ctlkGv
Editing by John Foley and Sharon Lam
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
