Rubio says Trump will continue to back Taiwan in a second term
Updates headline, adds detail on paragraph 4
By Nathan Layne
MILWAUKEE, July 18 (Reuters) -Republican Senator Marco Rubio, who was a finalist to be Donald Trump's running mate in the U.S. presidential campaign, said on Thursday he expected the U.S. would continue to support Taiwan under a Trump presidency.
Trump raised questions about his commitment to the democratically governed island claimed by China with his remarks in a June 25 interview published this week in which he said Taiwan should pay the U.S. for its defense.
When asked about Trump's Taiwan comments, Rubio told a group of reporters on the sidelines of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee that the "existential threat" Taiwan faced meant it should boost defense expenditures.
The Florida senator, an important voice on U.S. foreign policy as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the most senior Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he expected Trump to continue to back Taiwan should he win the White House.
"He'll do what he did in his first term and that is ... continue to support Taiwan," Rubio said of Trump.
"I can't speak for the Trump presidency, but I don't have any worries about the U.S. being supportive of Taiwan and doing everything we can to discourage the Chinese from invading," Rubio said.
Analysts view Rubio as a possible candidate for a cabinet post in any second Trump administration.
Robert O'Brien, one of Trump's former national security advisers, has also defended the former president's remarks, saying on Wednesday he believed Trump meant to indicate that there should be more burden sharing for Taiwan's security.
Despite only having unofficial relations with Taiwan, the U.S. is its biggest backer and weapons supplier in the face of years of increased military pressure by China, which has never renounced the use of force to bring the island under its control.
Under the Taiwan Relations Act, Washington has committed to provide Taiwan with means to defend itself, but U.S. law does not mandate that Washington come to Taiwan's aid if attacked.
While the U.S. has long followed a policy of "strategic ambiguity" on whether it would intervene militarily to protect Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack, the island's status is a constant source of friction between Beijing and Washington.
Democratic U.S. President Joe Biden has said he would be willing to use force to defend Taiwan.
Reporting by Nathan Layne and Michael Martina; Editing by Don Durfee and Daniel Wallis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
