Producers of Netflix hit 'Love is Blind' accused of US labor law violations
NLRB accuses producers of misclassifying cast as participants
Complaint seeks reclassification and rescinding of unlawful agreements
A lawsuit against Netflix and Delirium by contestant Poche continues
By Daniel Wiessner
Dec 12 (Reuters) -The producers of Netflix's NFLX.O hit reality dating show "Love is Blind" have been accused by a U.S. labor board of attempting to strip cast members of their rights to discuss working conditions and speak publicly about their experiences.
The National Labor Relations Board in a complaint issued on Wednesday said Delirium TV and Kinetic Content intentionally misclassified cast members as "participants" rather than employees so they would not be covered by federal labor law, an NLRB spokeswoman said on Thursday.
The companies also allegedly forced "Love is Blind" contestants to sign agreements containing illegal noncompete and confidentiality provisions and barred them from discussing the terms of their participation, the spokeswoman said.
"Love is Blind," which recently concluded its seventh season, features contestants who go on "dates" in small rooms separated by a barrier so they cannot see each other. Couples meet face-to-face only if they become engaged.
When Renee Poche, a contestant from the show's fifth season whose storyline never aired, spoke about her experiences on a podcast, Delirium filed a $4 million complaint against her in arbitration, the NLRB said.
Netflix, which is not named in the complaint, declined to comment. A lawyer for the production companies did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Mark Geragos, a lawyer who represents Poche, said the case "promises to change the reality TV industry forever."
"The practices identified by the NLRB in its complaint against Delirium are ubiquitous in this space," Geragos said in an email. "This is not the last shoe to drop."
NLRB complaints are heard by administrative judges, whose decisions can be reviewed by a five-member board appointed by the U.S. president. The board's decision can be brought before a federal appeals court, and the entire process can take years.
The complaint seeks to require Delirium and Kinetic to reclassify show participants as their employees, rescind the allegedly unlawful agreements and pay former contestants for any financial harm caused by the companies' alleged conduct.
Poche, a veterinarian from Texas, sued Netflix and Delirium earlier this year seeking to block the arbitration case against her. A California state judge ruled against her in March, and she is appealing the decision.
Poche claims she was paired with a man who lied about his background and was violent, erratic and addicted to drugs and alcohol.
Netflix and the production companies earlier this year agreed to pay $1.4 million to settle a proposed class action claiming that "Love is Blind" contestants were their employees and should have been paid the minimum wage under California law. The companies denied wrongdoing.
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York
Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Matthew Lewis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
