Police summon Aviva India CEO in discrimination case, company denies allegations
Adds allegations in paragraph 11
By Arpan Chaturvedi and Aditya Kalra
NEW DELHI, Oct 30 (Reuters) -Indian police have summoned Asit Rath, the chief executive of British insurer Aviva AV.L in the country, as part of an inquiry into a former employee's accusations of religious discrimination at work, documents seen by Reuters showed.
The investigation, in the northern city of Faridkot in Punjab is the latest headache for the company, which faces scrutiny by tax authorities, who accuse it of making illegal payments to insurance brokers, accusations it has denied.
Saturday's summons, seen by Reuters, asked Rath and another Aviva official to appear before the police in Punjab as part of the inquiry, advising, "It should be considered very important". It was not immediately clear if the executives had done so.
In a statement to Reuters, Aviva denied the discrimination accusations as being "factually incorrect".
The matter stems from a complaint to police by a former employee, Gurbir Singh, a Sikh who accused company executives of subjecting him to discrimination and derogatory comments because of his religion, police records show.
Rath, who is an Indian insurance industry veteran based at Aviva's office in Gurugram near New Delhi, did not respond to a request for comment. Singh, the complainant, said he had appeared before police in the inquiry, but could not comment further while the investigation is underway.
The office of the senior superintendent of police in Faridkot, which is handling the inquiry, did not respond to a request for comment.
Aviva's spokesperson, based in Britain, said Aviva India "strongly denies any discrimination as claimed and has robust policies to ensure fair treatment to all employees".
"Aviva India considers the alleged complaint filed by the ex-employee as factually incorrect, without any merit and is now the subject of legal proceedings so we will not be commenting further," the spokesperson added.
Registration details shows the case was filed under provisions of the law that criminalise insults to anyone's religion with malicious intent, for which offenders may face up to three years in jail.
Police said in the Sept. 14 case registration document that Singh had alleged "persistent and deliberate humiliation".
Aviva India is a joint venture between Aviva Global and Dabur Invest Corp., a prominent domestic firm. Aviva owns 74% of the business, after increasing its stake from 49% in 2022.
Reporting by Arpan Chaturvedi; Editing by Clarence Fernandez and Helen Popper
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
