Olympics-Second review of Brisbane 2032 stadiums and venues launched
SYDNEY, Nov 29 (Reuters) -The newly-elected premier of the Australian state of Queensland launched a second review of the main stadium options for the 2032 Brisbane Olympics on Friday, tasking an independent board with resolving the thorny issue.
David Crisafulli, whose Liberal National Party won the state election in late October and promised a solution within 100 days of taking power, made the announcement at the Future Brisbane event in the city.
The seven-person Games Independent Infrastructure and Coordination Authority, chaired by property expert Stephen Conry and established by legislation on Thursday, will have a wide remit for their review and produce a "bold plan" for the Games.
They will take a broad look at every planned venue, the Athletes' Villages and the transport infrastructure linking it all, as well as the potential legacy of the Olympics.
"Today we fire the starter's gun on Brisbane 2032 after 1,200 lost days," Crisafulli later posted on social media.
"Seven experts in their fields will help guide planning for a world class Games we can be proud of and a legacy future generations will rely on.
"We will put Queensland back on the path to victory for 2032."
The debate over a main Olympic stadium has been the very definition of a political football in the northeastern Australian state since Brisbane was awarded the Games in 2021.
The original plan was a A$2.7 billion ($1.76 billion) revamp of Brisbane's Gabba cricket stadium but Crisafulli's predecessor as premier, Steven Miles, blanched at the cost and ordered a review of plans last December.
The review, led by former city mayor Graham Quirk, reported in March and proposed a new purpose-built 55,000-seat Olympic stadium be constructed in an inner city park at a cost of A$3.4 billion.
Miles rejected the recommendation, again on the grounds of cost, and instead decided rugby stadium Lang Park would host the ceremonies with the track and field shunted out to the QSAC athletics ground in southern suburbs of the city.
Australian athletics great Raelene Boyle responded by saying Brisbane was planning a "cheapskate" Games and a group of local Olympic champions said in a letter to the government that using the QSAC site would be an "embarrassment" for the state.
At Future Brisbane on Friday, Crisafulli suggested the review could result in more events being moved to venues outside Brisbane and reiterated his view that a major new stadium was not required.
"What I think we need is world class venues," he said.
"We don't have that at the moment. We've allowed that to disappear, and I want to see world class venues."
Refurbished venues would meet with the approval of Olympic chiefs, who awarded Brisbane the Games under the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) "New Norms" process aimed at saving hundreds of millions of dollars for hosts.
($1 = 1.5337 Australian dollars)
Reporting by Nick Mulvenney, editing by Peter Rutherford
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
