XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Nissan and Honda would drive better together



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>BREAKINGVIEWS-Nissan and Honda would drive better together</title></head><body>

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.

By Katrina Hamlin

HONG KONG, Nov 29 (Reuters Breakingviews) -It's time for Toyota Motor's 7203.T two biggest domestic rivals to deal with their problems by joining forces. Nissan Motor's 7201.T woes are the more obvious: poor results prompted the $9 billion manufacturer into an emergency overhaul this month. But $40 billion Honda Motor's 7267.T autos unit is subpar, too. Welding them together would give scope to cut costs, charge earnings and invest more efficiently and effectively in electric vehicles and other technology.

Nissan CEO Makoto Uchida's turnaround plan involves cutting 9,000 jobs and 20% of manufacturing capacity. That's only likely to take the automotive division's operating margin to 0.4% in the March 2026 financial year, per forecasts gathered by Visible Alpha. The company also seems willing to have Honda as a long-term shareholder, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing sources.

Honda's operating margin at its carmaking business is just 3.6% - way below its motorcycle division's 18% - and may only improve by around a percentage point by the 12 months to the end of March 2026, analysts estimate.

Together, Nissan and Honda would sell nearly 6 million vehicles that year, according to Visible Alpha. Since the pair share key markets, they would be able to shrink spending on everything from administration and procurement to factories and research.

Lifting their game to match Toyota's 10% operating margin is probably a stretch, requiring around $12 billion in cost cuts, equivalent to 7.5% of the combined companies' top line. Getting that margin to 7% - just over half way between the 3% the combined entity would theoretically achieve without any cuts and its larger rival's 10% - could be doable. That'd require slashing expenses equal to roughly 4% of revenue. That's more than the 2.7% Peugeot and Fiat Chrysler targeted when they first agreed in 2019 to tie the knot and become Stellantis STLAM.MI. But it's in line with the savings rate implied by goals Renault RENA.PA, Nissan and Mitsubishi Motors 7211.T set for their alliance back in 2017. Nissan and Honda could crunch more costs by meshing their auto-finance units.

Merging the two is hardly a new idea: they came under pressure from Japan's government to contemplate a merger in 2019, the Financial Times reported. Former Nissan chair Carlos Ghosn has already dubbed potential cooperation on EVs and software a “disguised takeover” by Honda. The companies have not indicated any such intentions. But earnings woes and merger maths suggest it's a road worth exploring.

Follow @KatrinaHamlin on X

CONTEXT NEWS

Nissan Motor is searching for an anchor investor as long-time partner Renault sells down its holding in the carmaker, the Financial Times reported on Nov. 26 citing sources. In addition, the people said Nissan would be open to Honda Motor buying a portion of its shares. The pair are also currently discussing a partnership on electric and autonomous vehicles.

Nissan on Nov. 7 announced a plan to cut 9,000 jobs and 20% of its global manufacturing capacity, and slashed its annual operating profit outlook by 70%.


Graphic: Nissan and Honda shares have underperformed https://reut.rs/49eode3


Editing by Antony Currie and Ujjaini Dutta

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.