Nestle plays down RFK Jr's anti-packaged food rhetoric
Nestle says it has common ground with RFK Jr on best practices
Says it has been driving change in nutrition
Says it has been in touch with Trump transition team
Adds more quotes, background. Changes media tag
By Richa Naidu
VEVEY, Switzerland, Nov 19 (Reuters) -Nestle NESN.S on Tuesday sought to play down any differences with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has been critical of packaged foods, saying it shared the next U.S. health agency chief's desire to improve agricultural practices and nutrition.
Kennedy, picked last week by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump to head the Department of Health and Human Services, said during his own presidential campaign that he wanted to "Make America Healthy Again" and called out Kellogg's Fruit Loops cereal in an interview two weeks ago.
Nestle is the world's biggest packaged foods group with products ranging from KitKat snacks and Nescafe coffee to Maggi noodles and Purina pet foods.
Speaking on the sidelines of Nestle's capital markets day for investors, Steve Presley, executive vice president and chief executive officer of Nestle's North America business, told Reuters he was "less concerned" by Kennedy's previous comments.
"If you step back from some of the emotional issues, what he believes in is more regenerative, cleaner agriculture, which we fully believe in," he said.
Presley said Nestle, whose U.S. brands include Nesquik drinks, Hot Pockets and Stouffer's frozen ready meals, had worked with the current U.S. administration and would work with the next.
"We have spoken to the (Trump transition) team absolutely as one of the largest manufacturers, both from an industry perspective and to help shape the agenda in terms of how they can help create economic opportunity in the U.S."
Packaged foods stocks - from Kellogg KLG.N to Coca-Cola Co KO.N and Nestle - fell on Friday when Kennedy's appointment was announced.
"It's still early," said Presley. "What was campaign rhetoric and what will move to policy?"
Presley said Nestle, which is in 97% of all U.S. households, had been driving changes for years around nutrition and health.
For instance, in 2019 the Swiss group said it would give its food products ratings according to their nutritional value so customers could better gauge the healthiness of their shopping.
"So for us, is it still too early to tell? Yes. But do we believe in the idea of better agricultural practices? Absolutely. Do we believe in better nutritional product profiles in the categories? We do."
Reporting by Richa Naidu; Editing by Matt Scuffham and Mark Potter
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
