Musk's X adds Twitch as defendant in lawsuit over advertising 'boycott'
By Mike Scarcella
Nov 19 (Reuters) -Elon Musk’s X has added live-streaming service Twitch to its lawsuit claiming dozens of companies conspired with an advertising industry group to boycott the social media platform, causing it to lose revenue.
Musk named Twitch as a defendant in an amended lawsuit filed on Monday night in federal court in Wichita Falls, Texas. California-based Twitch is a subsidiary of Amazon.com AMZN.O, which was not named in the complaint.
The original August lawsuit accused the World Federation of Advertisers, CVS Health, candy maker Mars and Danish renewable energy company Orsted of conspiring along with others to withhold “billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from X, previously known as Twitter, after Musk bought the company.
X said the defendants formed a "group boycott" that violated U.S. antitrust law by hampering the free flow of ad dollars.
Twitch and its parent Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and neither did X.
The other defendants have not yet responded in court to X’s claims and either declined to comment or did not immediately respond to comment requests on Tuesday.
Monday's amended lawsuit formally dropped Unilever as a defendant, after the company said in October that it had reached an agreement with X.
World Federation of Advertisers launched an initiative in 2019 to “help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetization via advertising.”
Following Musk's purchase of Twitter in October 2022, some advertisers were wary that ads for their brands would appear next to harmful content, such as racist or false posts, that might have been removed under prior management. Ad revenue at X slumped for months after the Twitter sale.
Twitch purchased no advertising from Twitter in the United States after November 2022, according to X’s lawsuit.
Musk has gained new prominence as a key force in U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's incoming administration, including in a newly-created role designed to cut government waste. Musk donated millions of dollars to Trump's Republican campaign.
The case is X Corp v World Federation of Advertisers et al, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 7:24-cv-00114-K.
For X: Harmeet Dhillon and Christopher Renner of Dhillon Law Group, and John Sullivan of S|L Law
For Twitch: No appearance yet
Read more:
Elon Musk's X drops Unilever from advertiser boycott lawsuit
Texas judge in lawsuit by Musk's X against advertisers exits case
Musk’s X accuses advertisers of boycotting platform in new lawsuit
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
