Modi's party distances itself from India's Adani amid opposition protests
By Krishna N. Das
NEW DELHI, Nov 26 (Reuters) -Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's party said it had no reason to defend billionaire Gautam Adani on Tuesday following his U.S. indictment over alleged bribery to secure power deals in India.
The main opposition Congress party has accused Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of shielding Adani and stonewalling independent investigations into his dealings in the country, charges the ruling party has denied. Congress workers have also held street protests demanding a parliamentary probe.
U.S. prosecutors have charged Adani, the ports-to-power group's founder, his nephew Sagar Adani and six others for their alleged roles in a $265 million scheme to bribe Indian officials to secure power supply deals across five Indian regions.
The group has denied the charges, calling them "baseless" and adding that it would "seek all possible legal recourse".
Federal Indian investigating agencies and the markets regulator have not commented on the indictment and did not respond to Reuters queries.
"We have nothing to defend him and we are not involved. Let him defend himself," BJP spokesperson Gopal Krishna Agarwal said by phone. "We are not against industrialists. We consider them as partners in nation-building. But the law will take its own course if they do something wrong."
Agarwal's comments came after a state ruled by an alliance including the BJP, Andhra Pradesh, said it would explore if it was possible to cancel a power supply contract linked to the Adani Group in the state.
Sources told Reuters on Tuesday that Andhra was likely to suspend the contract and ask the federal government to investigate the charges.
Adani Group and the Andhra government did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
U.S. authorities have charged Gautam Adani and the other defendants with agreeing to pay bribes to unnamed Indian government officials to obtain solar power-supply contracts in Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh states, as well as the federal territory of Jammu and Kashmir, between 2021 and 2022.
All the states named by U.S. authorities were at the time ruled by parties opposed to Modi's ruling alliance. Those parties have denied any wrongdoing, saying they had not dealt with Adani but a federal government agency.
The Adani Group has businesses across Indian states ruled by different parties, and the BJP's Agarwal said he expected those to continue.
"They have exposure in all states. And projects will continue, they will keep running," he said.
Reporting by Krishna N. Das; Editing by Alex Richardson
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
