XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Late 2027 looms as 'realistic' date for Europe's stock market shake up



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Late 2027 looms as 'realistic' date for Europe's stock market shake up</title></head><body>

By Huw Jones

LONDON, July 10 (Reuters) -A coordinated move by stock markets in the European Union and Britain to catch up with Wall Street by halving the settlement time for transactions could realistically happen in late 2027, an EU regulatory hearing was told on Wednesday.

Trades on the London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Boerse, Euronext and other bourses in Europe take two business days to settle, lagging one business day (T+1) in the United States since May.

The European Securities and Markets Authority, the bloc's markets watchdog, held a hearing on Wednesday where a poll of participants overwhelmingly backed an option to complete T+1 in the fourth quarter of 2027.

Britain has targeted the end of 2027 at the latest, and later this year the EU's executive European Commission is expected to propose a date, with technical preparations already underway.

"Q4 2027, with all that is already happening, I think is realistic, I don't think it's too much of a stretch," Sebastijan Hrovatin, a senior official at the European Commission, told the hearing, adding that a final decision would be up to the EU states and the European Parliament.

Andrew Douglas, head of Britain's T+1 industry group now compiling recommendations for UK regulators, said these would include a move date "that is looking increasingly like the back end of 2027, probably September, October."

Douglas said he was not sure how the EU and UK could formally cooperate given post-Brexit political sensitivities, but it was necessary for both to align with the United States.

Douglas said for EU-UK coordination to take place, the EU needed to "pick a date and stick with it", as advised by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler.

The perceived success of the U.S. move has led to a "voluble lobby" in Britain calling for a shift in 2026, but Douglas said that "realistically, I am not sure that's on the table".

Initially, Europe's funds industry body EFAMA was lukewarm to T+1, but it told the hearing that its views have evolved after Wall Street's successful shift, with over half the world's equity trading now on T+1.

Vincent Ingham, EFAMA's director of regulatory policy, said a need to preserve competitiveness in European markets made a compelling case for the EU "to move as quickly as practically and operationally feasible to T+1, co-ordinated with the UK and Switzerland."




Reporting by Huw Jones
Editing by Christina Fincher

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.