How India's Byju's went from startup star to facing insolvency
Updates with latest developments
By Ashwin Manikandan and VarunVyas Hebbalalu
BENGALURU/MUMBAI, Aug. 14 (Reuters) -India's top court revived insolvency proceedings against edtech company Byju's on Wednesday following a lawsuit from U.S. lenders.
The latest court order deepens a crisis that has seen the one-time market darling's valuation plunge from about $22 billion to less than $2 billion.
Here is an overview of Byju's and its troubles:
WHAT TRIGGERED THE INSOLVENCY?
The Indian cricket board last year asked a tribunal to initiate insolvency proceedings against Byju's for defaulting on $19 million of dues. The dispute is over payments related to sponsorship rights for the Indian cricket team's jerseys.
The two sides had settled the matter, with Byju's agreeing to pay the full amount. Following that, an appeals tribunal quashed the insolvency proceedings against the company.
WHAT ARE THE U.S. LENDERS SAYING?
The settlement and the quashing of insolvency proceedings prompted U.S. lenders represented by Glas Trust to approach India's Supreme Court.
These lenders say they are owed $1 billion by the company.
Glas argues that Byju's is using the money owed to lenders to pay the cricket board.
India's Supreme Court stayed the tribunal's order and will re-start insolvency proceedings against Byju's.
WHAT'S THE TUSSLE WITH INVESTORS?
In February, a group of shareholders, including tech investor Prosus, alleged "financial mismanagement and compliance issues" at Byju's and called for the removal of founder and CEO Byju Raveendran, and a reconstitution of the board.
"We are deeply concerned about the future stability of the company under its current leadership and with the current constitution of the Board," the shareholders said.
Byju's, which has denied mismanagement, says the investors don't have the power to vote out its CEO.
In June, Prosus wrote off the value of its 9.6% stake in Byju's, making the Dutch firm the first to fully write-off its investment in the troubled startup.
WHY DID DELOITTE, BOARD MEMBERS RESIGN?
Last year, Deloitte said it was resigning as auditor because Byju's had delayed financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2022. Deloitte said it did not receive necessary documents even after writing several letters to the board.
Three board members of Byju's - representing investors Peak XV Partners (previously Sequoia Capital India), Prosus and Chan Zuckerberg Initiative - also stepped down.
WHAT DOES BYJU'S DO?
Byju's says it is the "world's largest education technology company". It offers online tutorials on subjects such as maths, physics and chemistry for school students.
The online business boomed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Byju's valuation shot up from $5 billion before the pandemic to $22 billion in 2022, and it acquired several companies on the way.
WHO ARE BYJU'S FOUNDERS?
Byju's is run by its founder, Byju Raveendran, and his wife, Divya Gokulnath. Raveendran, an engineer by training whose parents were teachers, started teaching mathematics to friends, and built the business as its popularity grew.
He launched Byju's in 2011 and its app in 2015.
Reporting by Ashwin Manikandan and Varun Hebbalalu in Bengaluru; Editing by Aditya Kalra and Mark Potter, Kirsten Donovan
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
