XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Google sued by top textbook publishers over ads for pirated e-books



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Google sued by top textbook publishers over ads for pirated e-books</title></head><body>

By Blake Brittain

June 5 (Reuters) -Google GOOGL.O was hit with a lawsuit on Wednesday by educational publishers Cengage, Macmillan Learning, McGraw Hill and Elsevier accusing the tech giant of promoting pirate copies of their textbooks.

The publishers told the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that Google has ignored thousands of copyright-infringement notices and continues to profit from the sale of pirated digital versions of textbooks advertised through its dominant search engine.

Google representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit. The publishers' attorney Matt Oppenheim of Oppenheim + Zebrak told Reuters that Google had become a "thieves' den" for textbook pirates.

The complaint said that Google searches for the publishers' work feature heavily discounted, pirated e-book versions at the top of the results.

"The artificially low-priced infringing works drown out the regularly priced legitimate works," the lawsuit said. "Of course, the pirate sellers can sell their infringing works at such low prices because they did nothing to create or license them; they just illegally made digital copies."

According to the lawsuit, Google has made the piracy worse by restricting ads for licensed e-books.

"As a result, the textbook market is upside down, as the world's largest online advertising business advertises ebooks for pirates but rejects ebook ads for legitimate sellers," the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit said that the publishers have been complaining to Google about the ads since 2021 to no avail. They accused Google of copyright and trademark infringement and deceptive trade practices, requesting an unspecified amount of monetary damages.


The case is Cengage Learning Inc v. Google LLC, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-04274.

For the publishers: Matt Oppenheim and Michele Murphy of Oppenheim + Zebrak

For Google: attorney information not yet available


Read more:

Textbook publishers sue 'shadow library' Library Genesis over pirated books



Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.