Exonerated trader settles $150 million lawsuit against Deutsche Bank
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, July 10 (Reuters) -A former Deutsche Bank DBKG.DE trader whose conviction in New York for rigging the Libor interest rate benchmark was overturned has settled his$150 million lawsuit accusing the German lender of making him a scapegoat by lying to prosecutors.
Matthew Connolly, who once led Deutsche Bank's pool trading desk, voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit accusing Deutsche Bank of malicious prosecution on Wednesday, a filing in Manhattan federal court showed.
A spokeswoman for Deutsche Bank said "the matter has been resolved," without providing details. Lawyers for Connolly did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Connolly and London-based colleague Gavin Black were convicted in 2018 for rigging Libor, with Connolly sentenced to six months of home confinement and a $100,000 fine.
But an appeals court overturned both convictions in January 2022, citing a lack of evidence of guilt.
Connolly said Deutsche Bank saw him as a "perfect fall guy" to insulate top executives responsible for rigging. The married father of two said his reputation and life were destroyed.
Last October, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan refused to dismiss Connolly's lawsuit.
Short for London interbank offered rate, Libor underpinned hundreds of trillions of dollars of credit cards, mortgages and other financial products before being phased out in 2022.
Libor probes led to about $9 billion of fines worldwide for banks, including $2.5 billion for Deutsche Bank in 2015.
Black is also suing Deutsche Bank for malicious prosecution, seeking $30 million.
A New York state judge in Manhattan refused in December to dismiss Black's case. Deutsche Bank's appeal from that decision is on hold until at least September, court records show.
Black's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Connolly's case is Connolly v. Deutsche Bank AG, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-09811. Black's case is Black v Deutsche Bank AG et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, No. 150762/2023, and New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 1st Department, No. 2024-00623.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Richard Chang
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
