EBay seeks judge's guidance to settle with victims of harassment campaign
By Nate Raymond
July 18 (Reuters) -EBay EBAY.O on Thursday sought court guidance to help it settle a lawsuit by a Massachusetts couple who were the victims of a bizarre stalking and harassment campaign carried out by several of its now-former employees after an online newsletter they published drew the ire of top executives.
The request, made by a lawyer for the e-commerce company during a hearing in Boston, came shortly before a different judge sentenced the last of the seven former eBay workers who had pleaded guilty to participating in the cyberstalking scheme.
Brian Gilbert, who served as senior manager of special operations for eBay's global security team and has been diagnosed with terminal cancer, was sentenced to no prison time and a $20,000 fine by U.S. District Judge William Young.
He was one of the seven ex-eBay workers who were charged in 2020 and who all pleaded guilty to participating in a campaign that prosecutors said aimed to silence David and Ina Steiner, whose newsletter EcommerceBytes had been deemed by top executives to be critical of their company.
Other employees have received sentences of as high as 57 months in prison for their roles in an extensive campaign in 2019 that involved sending the Steiners cockroaches, fly larvae and a bloody Halloween pig mask and surveiling their home in Natick, Massachusetts.
San Jose, California-based eBay agreed in January to pay $3 million under a criminal deferred prosecution agreement. But the company and some ex-eBay executives and employees remain defendants in a separate civil lawsuit by the Steiners.
During a hearing before U.S. District Judge Patti Saris, eBay counsel Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin said the company was seeking to settle the lawsuit.
But he said it became clear during a mediation last month that the parties needed guidance from Saris on a key issue if they were to resolve the case: Whether the Steiners are entitled to seek punitive damages.
Under Massachusetts law, the Steiners would not be entitled to seek punitive damages against eBay, but the Steiners' lawyers, led by Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners, contend California law would govern that damages claim.
"Is this the barrier to settlement?” Saris asked.
"I would not say it's the only barrier but I would say that it became a significant issue in settlement discussions,” Pirozzolo said.
The judge asked the parties to propose a schedule to brief the issue so she could address it before an expected trial next year.
The case is Steiner v. eBay Inc, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 21-cv-11181.
For the Steiners: Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners
For eBay: Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
