Court validates Mississippi's lifetime ban on felons voting
By Nate Raymond
July 18 (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Thursday upheld Mississippi's lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of certain felonies, saying the policy was not a cruel and unusual punishment.
The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit of Appeals on a 13-6 vote upheld a provision of Republican-backed Mississippi state constitution that dates back to the Jim Crow era that today disenfranchises people convicted of a set of crimes, including murder, rape and theft.
An 2-1 panel dominated by judges appointed by Democratic presidents in August had sided with a group of former convicts who sued in 2018 to regain their right to vote, finding the ban violated the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and usual punishment.
But the conservative-leaning court later voted to have the full 5th Circuit reconsider the matter, resulting in Thursday's ruling, in which all but one of the 13 judges in the majority were appointed by Republican presidents.
U.S. Circuit Judge Edith Jones, writing for the majority, said the U.S. Supreme Court had already in 1974 held states could enact laws disenfranchising felons.
If the plaintiffs wanted to eliminate Mississippi's ban, they needed to instead seek a change in law "through public consensus effectuated in the legislative process, not by judicial fiat," Jones wrote.
Jonathan Youngwood, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, in a statement said they were exploring next steps. "We remain confident in this case, and our clients remain committed to ensuring that their right to vote is restored," he said.
U.S. Circuit Judge James Dennis, in a dissenting opinion joined by five fellow appointees of Democratic presidents, said Mississippi is today among a minority of 11 states that still permanently disenfranchise felons for offenses other than election-related ones.
"Denying released offenders the right to vote takes away their full dignity as citizens, separates them from the rest of their community, and reduces them to 'other' status," Dennis wrote.
He said delegates of the Mississippi Constitutional Convention of 1890 intended the provision, Section 241, "to be nothing else but punitive" and stemmed from a desire to discriminate against Black people in the South after the U.S. Civil War.
The provision's list of disqualifying crimes has been amended twice in the years since, but it has continued to disproportionately affect Black people, according to court records.
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Aurora Ellis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
