Corporate execs see complications from more fund democracy: Ross Kerber
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. This column is part of the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter, which you can sign up for here
By Ross Kerber
Nov 27 (Reuters) -Programs to let investors influence the votes cast by their mutual funds at corporate annual meetings could complicate the contests, company leaders worry, hardly the goal of reformers.
BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street have each rolled out capabilities for investors to shape the funds' votes on matters like the election of directors or advisory votes on executive pay. Sometimes known as the Big Three, theseproviders of low-cost passive funds have come to run some $26 trillion between them, a massive share of Corporate America.
The programs offer an intriguing path for shareholders to shape executives' decisions rather than just to sell the stocks of companies when they aren't happy - the "Wall Street Walk." The programs also could reduce the political criticism the firms face over their votes tied to climate change or workforce diversity matters.
So far the major programs do not allow fund investors to direct votes at particular companies. Instead they allow investors to choose among voting policies like those licensed from proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services, Glass Lewis, and Egan-Jones.
Paul Washington, CEO of the Society for Corporate Governance, which represents corporate secretaries and other professionals, said its members welcome the efforts in principle. But some worry it will be harder to communicate with individual fund investors than it is now, when company executivesmust only win support from the stewardship teams at each of the Big Three.
"There are some challenges with moving the voting further upstream" Washington said.
Fund executives have acknowledged voting technology and accounting need improvements to facilitate shareholder communications to grow programs that have accounted for few votes so far.Even a small reduction in the voting power of the Big Three could make a difference in close contests.
"The impact of voter choice programs is that they introduce a new variable into these wells of support that didn’t previously exist, potentially drawing from them and making it less certain how much voting authority those investors will ultimately retain," said Steven Pantina, the co-founder of Proxy Analytics LLC of Newark, N.J., which helps companies interact with shareholders.
Last year Washington's group sent ISS a letter objecting to the name of one of its voting policies, which it terms "board-aligned." The Society said the policy was essentially the same as ISS's traditional benchmark policy with a few exceptions such as on environmental or social matters.
Asked about the letter, an ISS representative said the policy is clearly described to clients and accurately labeled. "The policy is not 'vote with management,' and, accordingly, nor is its name," said the representative.
Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
